Nitel San Diego to Seattle and Phoenix correcting prior NORJAK teletype

Document date 7 January 1972

Part 8page 721 pageDB Cooper-91

Open in FBI Vault (Part 8, page 72 of the PDF)
Report a problem

Email this to [email protected]

Id: Cooper-Part-08:072-072

Subject: Cooper Files: Cooper-Part-08:072-072

Document: Nitel San Diego to Seattle and Phoenix correcting prior NORJAK teletype
Id: Cooper-Part-08:072-072
Page: https://cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-08%3A072-072

What is wrong (title, date, type, which pages belong together, copies)?


What does the scan show?

Open in email app

A person reads every report. Corrections are made by hand, to the data — titles, dates, names, which pages belong together — never to the scans, and they can take a while to appear.

FBI 164-81, Vault Part 8 p. 72 (DB Cooper-91), Teletype, dated 7 Jan 1972, serial SD 164-91-34 (as read from the transcript) — cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-08%3A072-072

FD-36 (Rev. 5-22-64)

F B I

Date: 1/7/72 Transmit the following in PLAINTEXT (Type in plaintext or code) Via TELETYPE NITEL (Priority)

---

TO: SEATTLE (164-81) 7:45PM JRW PHOENIX (164-100) 8:50PM DNL

FROM: SAN DIEGO (164-91)

NORJAK

RE SAN DIEGO TEL JANUARY SIX, LAST.

FOR INFORMATION PHOENIX, RELATIVES IN REFERENCED COMMUNICATION INADVERTENTLY OMITTED. RELATIVES SHOULD READ [REDACTED b6/b7C] PHOENIX, ARIZONA; [REDACTED b6/b7C] SAME ADDRESS. SECTION ON PAGE TWO CAPTIONED RELATIVES SHOULD READ REFERENCES.

PHOENIX. WILL COVER LEAD AS SET OUT IN REFERENCED SAN DIEGO TELETYPE.

CONSIDER UNSUB DANGEROUS.

(164-91) TMK:ejt (1) ep

---

164-91-34 [Stamp: SD HILD (partially legible)] [Signature: illegible] [Signature: Turk (guess)]

Approved: [signature] Special Agent in Charge Sent _____ M Per [signature] DB Cooper-91

Serials: PX 164-100, SD 164-91, SD 164-91-34, SE 164-81