SAC Denver to SAC Seattle re KMGH Channel 7 caller, NORJAK (duplicate copy)
Document date 11 July 1989
Report a problem
Email this to [email protected]
Id: Cooper-Part-08:173-173
Subject: Cooper Files: Cooper-Part-08:173-173 Document: Airtel SAC Denver to SAC Seattle re KMGH Channel 7 caller, NORJAK (duplicate copy) Id: Cooper-Part-08:173-173 Page: https://cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-08%3A173-173 What is wrong (title, date, type, which pages belong together, copies)? What does the scan show?
A person reads every report. Corrections are made by hand, to the data — titles, dates, names, which pages belong together — never to the scans, and they can take a while to appear.
FBI 164-81, Vault Part 8 p. 173 (DB Cooper-226), Airtel, dated 11 Jul 1989 — cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-08%3A173-173
FD-36 (Rev. 8-29-[?]5)
FBI
TRANSMIT VIA: [ ] Teletype [ ] Facsimile [X] AIRTEL
PRECEDENCE: [ ] Immediate [ ] Priority [ ] Routine
CLASSIFICATION: [ ] TOP SECRET [ ] SECRET [ ] CONFIDENTIAL [ ] UNCLAS E F T O [ ] UNCLAS
Date 7/11/89
---
1 TO : SAC, SEATTLE (164A-81)
2 FROM : SAC, DENVER (164A-640)(RUC)
3 SUBJECT: NORJAK OO: SEATTLE
4
5
6 On 7/5/89, Denver television station KMGH, Channel 7, CBS affiliate [redacted] advised SAC, Denver, as 7 follows:
8 An anonymous caller told her on 7/5/89, that he knows of a person. [redacted] (LNU) who lives at 9 [redacted] Phoenix, Arizona, and he believes that [redacted] (LNU) is D.B. COOPER. [redacted] (LNU) [redacted] on numerous 10 occasions.
11 The caller refused to furnish his name and said the reason is that he is wanted for [redacted] 12 13 ARMED AND DANGEROUS.
14 15 16
17 2 - Seattle 18 (2) - Phoenix 1 - Denver 19 REB/evp (5)
20 21 [signature] 164As. c1-2[3?]
[stamps: oo so] JUL 19 1989 [initialed]
- 1 -
Approved: ___________ Transmitted _____________ Per ___________ (Number) (Time)
DB Cooper-226
Serials: DN 164-640, SE 164-81