SAC Minneapolis to SAC Phoenix re NORJACK subject, Scott County MN records
Document date 15 September 1989
Also filed separately as sections:
Report a problem
Email this to [email protected]
Id: Cooper-Part-08:181-182
Subject: Cooper Files: Cooper-Part-08:181-182 Document: Airtel SAC Minneapolis to SAC Phoenix re NORJACK subject, Scott County MN records Id: Cooper-Part-08:181-182 Page: https://cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-08%3A181-182 What is wrong (title, date, type, which pages belong together, copies)? What does the scan show?
A person reads every report. Corrections are made by hand, to the data — titles, dates, names, which pages belong together — never to the scans, and they can take a while to appear.
FBI 164-81, Vault Part 8 pp. 181–182 (DB Cooper-234–235), Airtel, dated 15 Sep 1989 — cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-08%3A181-182
FD-36 (Rev. 8-29-85)
FBI
TRANSMIT VIA: PRECEDENCE: CLASSIFICATION: [ ] Teletype [ ] Immediate [ ] TOP SECRET [ ] Facsimile [ ] Priority [ ] SECRET [X] AIRTEL [ ] Routine [ ] CONFIDENTIAL [ ] UNCLAS E F T O [ ] UNCLAS
Date 9/15/89
---
1 TO : SAC, PHOENIX (164A-571) 2 FROM : SAC, MINNEAPOLIS (164A-SE-81) (RUC) 3 SUBJECT: NORJACK; AIRCRAFT HIJACKING 4 OO: SEATTLE 5 6 Re Phoenix airtel to Minneapolis, dated 5/12/89. 7 Enclosed for Phoenix are: 8 1. Two police reports from the Apple Valley, Minnesota, Police Department, dated [redacted] 83; and [redacted] 83. 9 10 2. One booking photograph of [redacted] 11 3. One photograph of [redacted] 12 Investigation conducted at [redacted] 13 Minnesota, revealed that [redacted] no longer reside at that address. 14 An NCIC check revealed that [redacted] has an 15 outstanding [redacted] dated [redacted] for [redacted] 16 17
---
Enclosure(?) [illegible] 3 - Phoenix (Encs.) [initialed] 1 - Seattle (Info.) 1 - Minneapolis RFR/rr (5)
[Handwritten left margin, partially legible:] Enclosure(?) 3 Enclosure(?) to 20 [illegible] Sent Seattle 21 9/25/89 via airtel
---
164ASE-81-28
SEARCHED .......... INDEXED ....... SERIALED \ FILED /
SEP 20 1989
[ENIX] [illegible initials/stamp]
---
DB Cooper-234
164A-SE-81
---
Warrants Division, Scott County Sheriff's Office, Minnesota, advised that they responded to [REDACTED] [REDACTED] Minnesota, on numerous occasions in early [REDACTED] on domestic complaints. Booking records in Scott County do not list a [REDACTED] lists a next of kin as [REDACTED] resides with [REDACTED] Minnesota.
---
Based on previous experience with individuals wanted for [REDACTED] offenses, an inquiry was made at the State of Minnesota, Department of Motor Vehicles, for individuals with similar descriptive data who applied for driver's license after 1985. An individual by the name of [REDACTED] date of birth [REDACTED] pounds, applied for a driver's license in 1987. [REDACTED] is currently residing at [REDACTED] Minneapolis, Minnesota. [REDACTED] is described as date of birth [REDACTED] pounds.
---
Mc Leod County Sheriff's Office was contacted and advised that during a short incarceration in [REDACTED] 1986, [REDACTED] listed [REDACTED]
---
On 7/28/89, the State of Minnesota, Bureau of Vital Statistics, advised that [REDACTED] is the [REDACTED] [REDACTED] Minnesota. Further investigation revealed that [REDACTED] were born on [REDACTED] and are the only [REDACTED] listed to [REDACTED]
---
Criminal checks reveal that [REDACTED] only arrest in Minnesota was for [REDACTED] /78. A booking photograph from this arrest is enclosed.
---
The current address for [REDACTED] is [REDACTED] Washington [REDACTED] holds a valid Washington State driver's license which expires on [REDACTED] and describes him as a white male, 6', with brown eyes, date of birth [REDACTED]
---
As per instructions from SA [REDACTED] Flagstaff Resident Agency, no interviews were conducted with the [REDACTED] families.
---
Due to the fact that there is no investigation remaining in the Minneapolis Division, this case is RUC.
---
DB Cooper-235
Serials: PX 164-571