SA to SAC San Diego re caller reporting possible Cooper in area

Document date 22 April 1974

Part 9page 331 pageDB Cooper-730

Open in FBI Vault (Part 9, page 33 of the PDF)
Report a problem

Email this to [email protected]

Id: Cooper-Part-09:033-033

Subject: Cooper Files: Cooper-Part-09:033-033

Document: Memo SA to SAC San Diego re caller reporting possible Cooper in area
Id: Cooper-Part-09:033-033
Page: https://cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-09%3A033-033

What is wrong (title, date, type, which pages belong together, copies)?


What does the scan show?

Open in email app

A person reads every report. Corrections are made by hand, to the data — titles, dates, names, which pages belong together — never to the scans, and they can take a while to appear.

FBI 164-81, Vault Part 9 p. 33 (DB Cooper-730), Memo, dated 22 Apr 1974, serial SD 164-91-86 (as read from the transcript) — cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-09%3A033-033

OPTIONAL FORM NO. 10 MAY 1962 EDITION GSA FPMR (41 CFR) 101-11.6 UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT Memorandum

TO : SAC, SAN DIEGO (164-91) DATE: 4/22/74

FROM : SA [REDACTED]

SUBJECT: NORJACK

---

On 4/17/74. [REDACTED] San Diego [REDACTED] phone [REDACTED] telephonically con- tacted this office to advise that a [REDACTED] has moved into the area of [REDACTED] and has [REDACTED] [REDACTED] She said that the [REDACTED] is D. B. COOPER. She said some of [REDACTED] are from Arizona and some of [REDACTED] are from Oregon.

She suggested that she be telephonically contacted prior to a personal interview by an Agent.

There is a [REDACTED] indexed into [REDACTED] and [REDACTED] but there is no way to determine if they are identical with the caller.

From the tone of the caller's conversation, it was felt that [REDACTED]

---

(2) - 164-91 DDW:tlb (2) [signature]

[Handwritten:] RO 164-91-86 SEARCHED [stamp] SERIAL 2a [REDACTED signature block] DB Cooper-730

Buy U.S. Savings Bonds Regularly on the Payroll Savings Plan 5010-108

Serials: SD 164-91, SD 164-91-86