Identification Division Latent Fingerprint Section report to SAC San Diego re NORJACK print comparison (negative)
Document date 16 September 1976
Report a problem
Email this to [email protected]
Id: Cooper-Part-09:066-067
Subject: Cooper Files: Cooper-Part-09:066-067 Document: Identification Division Latent Fingerprint Section report to SAC San Diego re NORJACK print comparison (negative) Id: Cooper-Part-09:066-067 Page: https://cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-09%3A066-067 What is wrong (title, date, type, which pages belong together, copies)? What does the scan show?
A person reads every report. Corrections are made by hand, to the data — titles, dates, names, which pages belong together — never to the scans, and they can take a while to appear.
FBI 164-81, Vault Part 9 pp. 66–67 (DB Cooper-768–769), Report, dated 16 Sep 1976, serial SD 164-91-109 (as read from the transcript) — cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-09%3A066-067
1-336 (Rev. 7-16-73) FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION Washington, D. C. 20537 REPORT of the IDENTIFICATION DIVISION LATENT FINGERPRINT SECTION
YOUR FILE NO. 164-91 September 16, 1976 FBI FILE NO. 164-2111 LATENT CASE NO. A-45410
TO: SAC, San Diego
RE: NORJACK
REFERENCE: Airtel 9/7/76 EXAMINATION REQUESTED BY: San Diego SPECIMENS:
---
The previously reported latent prints in the captioned case are not identical with the fingerprints of [REDACTED] born [REDACTED] in [REDACTED] Palm prints of this individual are not available in Identification Division files.
---
2 - Seattle (164-81)
164-91-109
[stamp: partially legible, appears to include "San Diego" and a date in 1976]
Clarence [Kel]ley, Director
THIS REPORT IS FURNISHED FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY
DB Cooper-768
164-91-109
---
SEARCHED INDEXED SERIALIZED FILED SEP 20 1976 FBI — SAN [illegible] 1D
---
DB Cooper-769
---
[illegible — heavy vertical striping artifact]
Serials: 164-2111, SD 164-91, SD 164-91-109, SE 164-81