SAC New Orleans to SAC Seattle re NORJAK suspect developed from informant

Document date 3 December 1976

Part 9pages 82–843 pagesDB Cooper-785–786

Also filed at: Part 121 pp. 265–266

Copies may differ in what was redacted.

Open in FBI Vault (Part 9, page 82 of the PDF)
Report a problem

Email this to [email protected]

Id: Cooper-Part-09:082-084

Subject: Cooper Files: Cooper-Part-09:082-084

Document: Airtel SAC New Orleans to SAC Seattle re NORJAK suspect developed from informant
Id: Cooper-Part-09:082-084
Page: https://cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-09%3A082-084

What is wrong (title, date, type, which pages belong together, copies)?


What does the scan show?

Open in email app

A person reads every report. Corrections are made by hand, to the data — titles, dates, names, which pages belong together — never to the scans, and they can take a while to appear.

FBI 164-81, Vault Part 9 pp. 82–84 (DB Cooper-785–786), Airtel, dated 3 Dec 1976, serial SD 164-91-119 (as read from the transcript) — cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-09%3A082-084

Page 1 of 3Part 9 p. 82

FD-36 (Rev. 2-14-74)

FBI

Date: 12/3/76

Transmit the following in ___________ (Type in plaintext or code) Via AIRTEL (Precedence)

---

TO: SAC, Seattle (164-81)

FROM: SAC, New Orleans (164-136) (P)

√ NORJAK AIRCRAFT HI-JACKING (OO: SEATTLE)

Re New Suspect: [redacted] also known as [redacted]

---

The following information concerns captioned new suspect in the D. B. COOPER sky-jacking incident.

On 11/30/76, [redacted] Louisiana, home telephone [redacted] telephonically advised as follows to SA [redacted]

In early 1975 or late 1974, a man calling himself [redacted]

[redacted] On [redacted] he claimed his date of birth was [redacted] SSAN [redacted] He also claimed he had [redacted] Washington, from [redacted] He was a white male, appeared to be about 40 years old, five feet ten inches tall, slender build, brown and slightly receding hair, parted on the left, and was a very neat dresser and took such care of himself that he was [redacted]

---

2 - Seattle 2 - Buffalo 2 - NYC 2 - Albany 2 - Atlanta 2 - Savannah 2 - Los Angeles (2) - San Diego 2 - San Francisco 2 - Sacramento 3 - New Orleans JAP/tac (25)

[stamped case number: 164-91-119] [date stamp: 1976] [redacted]

Approved: [signature] Sent [signatures] Special Agent in Charge

GPO: BBCooper-784

NO 164-136 JAP/tac

---

[Two circular stamp-like marks visible at top center of page]

---

from [REDACTED] Louisiana. While [he became friendly with] [REDACTED] who [REDACTED] In conversations with [REDACTED] however, he advised he had been [REDACTED] [REDACTED] that he had [REDACTED] [REDACTED] New York, and [REDACTED] New York City. He was a well-spoken man and appeared to be educated.

---

Without any prior warning, he disappeared from [about late] [REDACTED] and in early [REDACTED] she was contacted by [REDACTED] deputies, name unknown, who told her he was [REDACTED] [REDACTED] He apparently was [REDACTED] the name [REDACTED]

---

She recently [REDACTED] [REDACTED] he had never re- contacted [REDACTED]

---

[REDACTED — large block, multiple lines fully obscured]

---

She advised [REDACTED] of [REDACTED] and that the general appearance of [REDACTED] seemed to her to be similar to that of D. B. COOPER.

---

On 11/30/76, NCIC was queried re above names, dates of birth, and SSAN's and California driver's license, and no hits made.

---

DB Cooper-785

NO 164-136 JAP/tac

---

[two circular stamps/marks, content unclear]

---

LEADS

ALL OFFICES

Review indices concerning subject and advise Seattle of any pertinent information.

NEW ORLEANS

At [REDACTED] Louisiana. Will obtain [REDACTED] [REDACTED] for Seattle and determine from local authorities nature of charges against him, these charges apparently not listed in NCIC in form of a warrant for subject.

At New Orleans, Louisiana. Review indices for any other pertinent information about subject.

---

Armed & Dangerous

---

3

DB Cooper-786

Serials: NO 164-136, SD 164-91-119, SE 164-81

Similar documents

Very similar text — possibly a copy redacted differently, or another memo written from the same template.