SAC San Francisco to SAC Seattle re NORJAK, copies to San Diego
Document date 13 May 1980
Report a problem
Email this to [email protected]
Id: Cooper-Part-09:211-211
Subject: Cooper Files: Cooper-Part-09:211-211 Document: Airtel SAC San Francisco to SAC Seattle re NORJAK, copies to San Diego Id: Cooper-Part-09:211-211 Page: https://cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-09%3A211-211 What is wrong (title, date, type, which pages belong together, copies)? What does the scan show?
A person reads every report. Corrections are made by hand, to the data — titles, dates, names, which pages belong together — never to the scans, and they can take a while to appear.
FBI 164-81, Vault Part 9 p. 211 (DB Cooper-915), Airtel, dated 13 May 1980, serial SD 164-91-175 (as read from the transcript) — cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-09%3A211-211
FD-36 (Rev. 5-22-78)
FBI
TRANSMIT VIA: PRECEDENCE: CLASSIFICATION: [ ] Teletype [ ] Immediate [ ] TOP SECRET [ ] Facsimile [ ] Priority [ ] SECRET [X] AIRTEL [ ] Routine [ ] CONFIDENTIAL [ ] UNCLAS E F T O [ ] UNCLAS Date 5/13/80
TO: SAC, SEATTLE (164-81)
FROM: SAC, SAN FRANCISCO (164-220)(P)(SQD 10)
SUBJECT: NORJAK (A); /44-91-/17[*] OO: SEATTLE
RE: [redacted b6/b7C]
---
Re San Francisco airtel to Miami, 4/15/80; and Miami airtel to Seattle, 5/1/80.
Being forwarded to the San Diego Office are copies of each referenced airtel. Enclosed for both the Seattle and Miami Offices are two copies each of a photograph of [redacted b6/b7C] [redacted b6/b7C]
San Diego requested to handle lead at El Cajon as set forth in referenced Miami airtel.
ARMED AND DANGEROUS.
---
2 - Seattle (Enc. 2) 2 - Miami (164-522) (Enc. 2) 2 - San Diego (Enc. 2) [circled/checkmarked] 2 - San Francisco DJB/lt (8)
Approved: _______________ Transmitted _______________ (Number) (Time)
---
164-91-175 SEARCHED [initialed] INDEXED SERIALIZED [initialed] FILED [initialed] MAY 19 1980 FBI — SAN DIEGO Per _____ [signature] FBI [stamp] DB Cooper-915
Serials: 164-522, SD 164-91-175, SE 164-81, SF 164-220
Similar documents
Very similar text — possibly a copy redacted differently, or another memo written from the same template.