SAC Las Vegas to SAC Seattle re NORJAK suspect inquiries in Nevada
Document date 29 September 1989
Report a problem
Email this to [email protected]
Id: Cooper-Part-09:241-242
Subject: Cooper Files: Cooper-Part-09:241-242 Document: Airtel SAC Las Vegas to SAC Seattle re NORJAK suspect inquiries in Nevada Id: Cooper-Part-09:241-242 Page: https://cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-09%3A241-242 What is wrong (title, date, type, which pages belong together, copies)? What does the scan show?
A person reads every report. Corrections are made by hand, to the data — titles, dates, names, which pages belong together — never to the scans, and they can take a while to appear.
FBI 164-81, Vault Part 9 pp. 241–242 (DB Cooper-947–948), Airtel, dated 29 Sep 1989 — cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-09%3A241-242
FD-36 (Rev. 8-29-85)
FBI
TRANSMIT VIA: PRECEDENCE: CLASSIFICATION: [ ] Teletype [ ] Immediate [ ] TOP SECRET [ ] Facsimile [ ] Priority [ ] SECRET [X] AIRTEL [ ] Routine [ ] CONFIDENTIAL [ ] UNCLAS E F T O [ ] UNCLAS
Date 9/29/89
---
1 TO : SAC, SEATTLE (164A-SE-81)
2 FROM : SAC, LAS VEGAS (RUC)
3 SUBJECT: NORJACK 4 UNSUB; aka D.B. COOPER, 5 [redacted] NEVADA OO: SEATTLE
---
6 Re Seattle airtel to Las Vegas dated 8/10/89.
7 On 9/2/89, investigation conducted at the U.S. Post 8 Office, [redacted] Nevada, concerning [redacted] determined 9 that the current box holder leased the box on 2/89. This box remained unrented from 12/88 - 1/89. Prior the box had been 10 rented from 1/88 - 6/88; however, no records are currently available at this post office for the renter of this box in 9/87. 11 The Postmaster advised that due to the frequent turnover of post office boxes at [redacted] Nevada, prior subscriber records are 12 disorganized and frequently disposed of after one year. The Postmaster did review current and past subscriber records 13 utilizing last names and stated that the name D.B. COOPER had never been used to rent a post office box.
14 Appropriate directories, as reviewed on 9/18/89, of the 15 [redacted] California area reflect that telephone number [redacted] was listed in [redacted] 16 California. The prior subscriber to this telephone number in [redacted] at the same 17 [redacted] address. The exact dates of the listings are unknown.
18
---
19 2 - Seattle 20 1 - San Diego (164A-91) (Info.) 5E 1649-81-195 21 1 - Las Vegas WJ:cf (4)
[stamp: SEARCHED FOLIAS] [stamp: SEARCHED MANUALLY] [stamp: [illegible]]
OCT 10 1989 FBI SAN DIEGO Per (Number) (Time)
Approved: [signature - illegible] Transmitted
DB Cooper-947
[two circular stamps/marks, contents unclear]
---
164A-SE-81
---
Records of the DOUGLAS COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE failed to reflect any arrest record or work card identifiable with [redacted b6/b7C] [redacted b6/b7C] These records did reflect that [redacted b6/b7C] white male. DOB [redacted b6/b7C] is employed at [redacted b6/b7C] [redacted b6/b7C] No arrest record was located for [redacted b6/b7C]
---
In the event Seattle Division is in need of further information concerning the telephone subscriber records to telephone number [redacted b6/b7C] the Sacramento Division at [redacted b6/b7C] [redacted b6/b7C] California, should be requested to examine the appropriate telephone records.
---
Inasmuch as no further investigation remains, Las Vegas Division considers this matter RUC'd.
---
-2*-
---
DB Cooper-948
Serials: SD 164-91