SAC Seattle to SAC Portland re NORJAK parachute/money information
Document date 16 July 1975
Report a problem
Email this to [email protected]
Id: Cooper-Part-09:341-342
Subject: Cooper Files: Cooper-Part-09:341-342 Document: Airtel SAC Seattle to SAC Portland re NORJAK parachute/money information Id: Cooper-Part-09:341-342 Page: https://cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-09%3A341-342 What is wrong (title, date, type, which pages belong together, copies)? What does the scan show?
A person reads every report. Corrections are made by hand, to the data — titles, dates, names, which pages belong together — never to the scans, and they can take a while to appear.
FBI 164-81, Vault Part 9 pp. 341–342 (DB Cooper-1056–1057), Airtel, dated 16 Jul 1975 — cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-09%3A341-342
FD-36 (Rev. 5-22-64)
F B I
Date: 7-16-75
Transmit the following in PLAIN (Type in plaintext or code)
Via AIRTEL AIRMAIL (Priority)
---
TO : SAC, PORTLAND (164-41) FROM : SAC, SEATTLE (164-81)(P) SUBJECT: NORJAK
---
On 7/15/75, [REDACTED] Office telephone [REDACTED] Seattle- [REDACTED] Seattle, Washington, said he received a call during the night hours of 7/14-15/75 from [REDACTED] Oregon, who, obviously intoxicated and in a rambling story, said he was in trouble which involved NWA. He wanted [REDACTED] to help if he could and then related that he had found a parachute which might be involved in the hijacking of NWA plane in November, 1971. He also intimated that they might know where the money was hidden.
---
[REDACTED] has not seen [REDACTED] for at least [REDACTED] years but they had [REDACTED] [REDACTED] is in [REDACTED] in [REDACTED]
---
At 8:00 AM, 7/15/75, [REDACTED] received another call, this time from [REDACTED] who explained, also in a rather confused way, that [REDACTED] are in difficulty, having been [REDACTED] then explained that they had [REDACTED] which had been at [REDACTED] Washington and in need of [REDACTED] It never was made clear to [REDACTED] if [REDACTED] was [REDACTED] to Oregon or elsewhere. [REDACTED] in some way, inferred that [REDACTED] was connected with the NWA hijacking. [REDACTED] that he had found the parachute [REDACTED] (not making it clear whether [REDACTED] business) while [REDACTED] The number [164-41 - 14/52]
---
2-Portland 2-Seattle CEF:ldk
[Handwritten signature - illegible]
SEARCHED INDEXED SERIALIZED FILED JUL 18 1975
Approved: ___________________ Sent ___ M ___ Special Agent in Charge
DB Cooper-1056
SE 164-81
---
on the parachute [REDACTED] the color was not given. [REDACTED] also said that they thought the money might be [REDACTED] He also said the parachute was [REDACTED]
---
[REDACTED] said that the difficulty involv- ing [REDACTED] is known to SA [REDACTED] at Eugene, Oregon and it was not clear if SA [REDACTED] had been advised of the above information.
---
Seattle file on NORJAK does not contain serial numbers of the parachutes. Therefore it is not possible to eliminate a particular chute on the basis of a number alone.
---
PORTLAND DIVISION At [REDACTED] Oregon
Interview [REDACTED] for clarification of their information to see if in fact it might relate to NORJAK.
---
If the circumstances of the finding of the para- chute could suggest that it might be involved in NORJAK, the chute should be obtained and forwarded to Seattle to be examined by the man who packed the chutes in the NORJAK case.
---
2.
DB Cooper-1057