To SAC Portland re interview concerning suspect resembling Cooper composite

Document date 2 February 1976

Part 9pages 455–4573 pagesDB Cooper-1179, DB Cooper-1181

Open in FBI Vault (Part 9, page 455 of the PDF)
Report a problem

Email this to [email protected]

Id: Cooper-Part-09:455-457

Subject: Cooper Files: Cooper-Part-09:455-457

Document: Memo to SAC Portland re interview concerning suspect resembling Cooper composite
Id: Cooper-Part-09:455-457
Page: https://cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-09%3A455-457

What is wrong (title, date, type, which pages belong together, copies)?


What does the scan show?

Open in email app

A person reads every report. Corrections are made by hand, to the data — titles, dates, names, which pages belong together — never to the scans, and they can take a while to appear.

FBI 164-81, Vault Part 9 pp. 455–457 (DB Cooper-1179, DB Cooper-1181), Memo, dated 2 Feb 1976 — cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-09%3A455-457

OPTIONAL FORM NO. 10 MAY 1962 EDITION GSA FPMR (41 CFR) 101-11.5 UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT Memorandum

TO : SAC, PORTLAND (164-41) (P) DATE: 2/2/76

FROM : SA [REDACTED]

SUBJECT: NORJAK OO: SEATTLE

---

Re Portland memo of SA [REDACTED] dated 1/5/76.

---

On 1/21/76, [REDACTED] resident address [REDACTED] Oregon, who is employed at the [REDACTED] Oregon, advised that he is [REDACTED] located in [REDACTED] Oregon.

[REDACTED] advised that during the time [REDACTED] he became acquainted with an individual he knew as [REDACTED] who at that time was employed as a [REDACTED] at [REDACTED] stated that [REDACTED] could be described as being an extremely "smooth" individual who was very convincing in everything he had to say. [REDACTED] further stated that during the time he knew [REDACTED] referred to himself as [REDACTED] however, [REDACTED] stated to his knowledge [REDACTED]

---

[REDACTED] advised that sometime in 1970 or 1971, exact date unrecalled, however, believes that it was sometime [REDACTED] of either of these years, he had [REDACTED] in [REDACTED] approximately [REDACTED] which had [REDACTED] number [REDACTED] stated that he had not personally [REDACTED] for an [REDACTED] who is currently employed as [REDACTED] at [REDACTED] Oregon, and for a [REDACTED] in the [REDACTED] area. [REDACTED] stated he could not recall the exact [REDACTED] however, he did recall [REDACTED] from a [REDACTED]

---

(3) - Portland RDM:sag (3) [signature illegible] Buy U.S. Savings Bonds Regularly on the Payroll Savings Plan DB Cooper-1179

Page 2 of 3Part 9 p. 456

[Two circular stamps/marks]

---

PD 164-41

---

[REDACTED] stated that he did not know where [REDACTED] had obtained the money [REDACTED] [REDACTED] however, stated that either [REDACTED] [REDACTED] could furnish additional information regarding the [REDACTED]

[REDACTED] advised that in his opinion [REDACTED] lived extremely well and outside of his income. [REDACTED] stated that to his knowledge in addition to [REDACTED] [REDACTED] also [REDACTED] unknown, [REDACTED] and he also [REDACTED] [REDACTED] advised that [REDACTED] appeared and acted if he had a lot of money, however, to his knowledge, the only income which [REDACTED] his employment at [REDACTED] further stated that he did have knowledge that the [REDACTED] [REDACTED] was [REDACTED] at one time to [REDACTED] [REDACTED] which [REDACTED] however, [REDACTED] could not recall what [REDACTED]

[REDACTED] advised that during [REDACTED] [REDACTED] on one occasion [REDACTED] for [REDACTED] stated this occurred when [REDACTED] over the [REDACTED] Oregon, at [REDACTED] [REDACTED] something [REDACTED] was [REDACTED] after which [REDACTED] observed [REDACTED] the [REDACTED] [REDACTED] advised he did not know this [REDACTED] stated he became because [REDACTED]

[REDACTED] advised that he would classify [REDACTED] as generally being [REDACTED] [REDACTED] further stated that he had no information which would indicate that [REDACTED] was or had been involved in any [REDACTED]

[REDACTED] advised that he had [REDACTED] approximately [REDACTED] during the time [REDACTED] [REDACTED] however, knew very little about [REDACTED] background. [REDACTED] stated that he did know that [REDACTED] name unrecalled, and a [REDACTED] and that every time [REDACTED] [REDACTED]

[REDACTED circular stamps/seals - two present at top of page]

---

PD 164-41

[REDACTED] advised that since [REDACTED] [REDACTED] one occasion when he [REDACTED] would have no [REDACTED] [REDACTED] information in his possession.

---

[REDACTED] was furnished a composite photograph of an individual known as D.B. COOPER and after viewing this photograph, [REDACTED] stated that he had never thought of [REDACTED] being identical with the D.B. COOPER photograph before. [REDACTED] stated in his opinion [REDACTED] did not resemble the composite drawing of COOPER, since [REDACTED] heavier in the face and did not have the same facial characteristics

---

[REDACTED] advised as follows regarding [REDACTED] [REDACTED]

Sex Male Race White Age In early 30's in 1971 or 1972 Height 5'9" Weight 180 - 185 pounds Build Husky

---

[REDACTED] advised he could not recall any additional descriptive information regarding [REDACTED]

[REDACTED] advised he could furnish no additional information regarding the individual known to him as [REDACTED]

---

LEADS

PORTLAND

AT [REDACTED] OREGON. Will interview [REDACTED] and [REDACTED] re- garding the [REDACTED] which was [REDACTED] in 1970 or 1971.

---

DB Cooper-1181

Serials: PD 164-41