SAC Portland to SAC Seattle re informant fearing loss of reward money in NORJAK suspect tip
Document date 12 November 1976
Report a problem
Email this to [email protected]
Id: Cooper-Part-10:070-071
Subject: Cooper Files: Cooper-Part-10:070-071 Document: Airtel SAC Portland to SAC Seattle re informant fearing loss of reward money in NORJAK suspect tip Id: Cooper-Part-10:070-071 Page: https://cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-10%3A070-071 What is wrong (title, date, type, which pages belong together, copies)? What does the scan show?
A person reads every report. Corrections are made by hand, to the data — titles, dates, names, which pages belong together — never to the scans, and they can take a while to appear.
FBI 164-81, Vault Part 10 pp. 70–71 (DB Cooper-1286–1287), Airtel, dated 12 Nov 1976, serial PD 164-41-1570 (as read from the transcript) — cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-10%3A070-071
FD-36 (Rev. 2-14-74)
FBI
Date: 11/12/76
Transmit the following in ___________ (Type in plaintext or code)
Via AIRTEL AIRMAIL (Precedence)
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
---
TO: SAC, SEATTLE (164-81)
FROM: SAC, PORTLAND (164-41)(P)
SUBJECT: NORJAK (OO: Seattle) BuFile 164-2111
---
UNIDENTIFIED SUSPECT SUGGESTED BY COMPLAINANT [REDACTED] WASHINGTON
On 11/9/76, [REDACTED] Washington, telephone [REDACTED] telephonically contacted the Portland Office.
[REDACTED] stated that for several years he has had an individual in mind who may be identical with Unsub. He stated that he was very reluctant to reveal the identity of the suspect because of [REDACTED]
[REDACTED] advised among his reasons for suspecting this individual are that the suspect has [REDACTED] [REDACTED] fits the published description of the hijacker, and resembles the artist's conception published in the newspapers.
[REDACTED] was interested in knowing whether a reward is still available for the identification and apprehension of Unsub. He advised that he was unwilling to reveal the identity of his suspect just at this time but would be willing to talk with an agent about it. He said he is [REDACTED] [REDACTED] Washington.
On 11/10/76, [REDACTED] [REDACTED] confidentially advised he had been contacted by telephone by [REDACTED] was interested in knowing whether a reward was offered
---
2 - Seattle 2 - Portland Approved: ___________ RPH:lbn Special Agent in Charge (4) [initials]
Searched _________ Serialized & [illegible] Index ed _________ DB Cooper-1286 Filed___________
GPO: 1975 O - 590-992 164-41-1570
PD 164-41
---
[REDACTED] in this matter and stated to [REDACTED] he was afraid if he furnished information concerning a suspect to the FBI, the FBI would cheat him out of the reward money. [REDACTED] stated he got the impression from conversation with [REDACTED]
---
LEAD
SEATTLE
AT [REDACTED], WASHINGTON. Will contact [REDACTED] [REDACTED] telephone [REDACTED] for the identity of his suspect in this matter. In view of [REDACTED] statement that he is frequently away, it is suggested he be contacted by telephone first.
ARMED AND DANGEROUS
---
- 2 -
---
DB Cooper-1287
---
b6 b7C b7D
Serials: 164-2111, PD 164-41, PD 164-41-1570, SE 164-81
Similar documents
Very similar text — possibly a copy redacted differently, or another memo written from the same template.