SAC Portland to SAC New Orleans setting lead to interview Louisiana complainant
Document date 8 December 1976
Also filed separately as sections:
Report a problem
Email this to [email protected]
Id: Cooper-Part-10:098-099
Subject: Cooper Files: Cooper-Part-10:098-099 Document: Airtel SAC Portland to SAC New Orleans setting lead to interview Louisiana complainant Id: Cooper-Part-10:098-099 Page: https://cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-10%3A098-099 What is wrong (title, date, type, which pages belong together, copies)? What does the scan show?
A person reads every report. Corrections are made by hand, to the data — titles, dates, names, which pages belong together — never to the scans, and they can take a while to appear.
FBI 164-81, Vault Part 10 pp. 98–99 (DB Cooper-1322–1323), Airtel, dated 8 Dec 1976 — cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-10%3A098-099
FD-36 (Rev. 2-14-74)
FBI
Date: 12/8/76
Transmit the following in _______________ (Type in plaintext or code) AIRTEL AIRMAIL Via _______________ (Precedence) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
---
TO: SAC, NEW ORLEANS
FROM: SAC, PORTLAND (164-41) (P)
SUBJECT: NORJAK (OO: Seattle) BuFile 164-2111
---
Re report of SA [REDACTED] dated 5/30/73, at Seattle, Washington.
On 12/3/76, [REDACTED] [REDACTED] Louisiana, telephoned [REDACTED] tele- phonically contacted SA [REDACTED] at the Portland Office to advise as follows:
A number of years ago [REDACTED] the FBI. [REDACTED] She recently saw an article concerning captioned hijacking and she believes she knows the identity of the individual who committed this hijacking. She declined to furnish any information concerning the identity of her suspect and she requested that if an Agent contacts her to get her information that he not tell [REDACTED] [REDACTED] Louisiana about any contact with her as [REDACTED] holds a grudge against her.
During this telephone call [REDACTED] on several occasions mentioned [REDACTED] and inquired concerning possible payment to her for information furnished. No commitment of any kind was made to her.
Portland indices are negative concerning [REDACTED]
---
2 - New Orleans 2 - Seattle (164-81) 2 - Portland
[REDACTED] GPH:cjf (6) Approved: [signature] Special Agent in Charge
Sent _____ Searched ___________ Serialized __________ Indexed M Per ____
DB Cooper-1322 GPO: 1975 O - 590-992 164-41-1S-89
PD 164-41
---
LEADS
NEW ORLEANS
AT [REDACTED] LOUISIANA. Will contact [REDACTED] for the identity of the suspect she has in mind and will thereafter conduct appropriate investigation, pursuant to guidelines set forth in referenced report to involve or eliminate her suspect
---
ARMED AND DANGEROUS
---
b6 b7C b7D
---
- 2 - DB Cooper-1323