Interview of 2/23/77 (Alexandria) re redacted subject

This copy: Part 10 p. 163Also filed at Part 121 p. 312 (primary) · Part 39 p. 240 · Part 72 p. 223 · Part 77 p. 341 · Part 120 p. 393

This copy’s own title

Re items furnished to FBI pursuant to subpoena — revised to match this copy’s own text.

Interviewed 23 February 1977Dictated 23 February 1977Transcribed 24 February 1977

Part 10page 1631 pageDB Cooper-1389

Another copy of this document is the primary, most legible copy: Part 121 p. 312.

Copies may differ in what was redacted.

Open in FBI Vault (Part 10, page 163 of the PDF)
Report a problem

Email this to [email protected]

Id: Cooper-Part-10:163-163

Subject: Cooper Files: Cooper-Part-10:163-163

Document: FD-302 re items furnished to FBI pursuant to subpoena
Id: Cooper-Part-10:163-163
Page: https://cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-10%3A163-163

What is wrong (title, date, type, which pages belong together, copies)?


What does the scan show?

Open in email app

A person reads every report. Corrections are made by hand, to the data — titles, dates, names, which pages belong together — never to the scans, and they can take a while to appear.

FBI 164-81, Vault Part 10 p. 163 (DB Cooper-1389), FD-302 interview, interviewed 23 Feb 1977 — cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-10%3A163-163

FD-302 (REV. 11-27-70)

FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION

Date of transcription 2/24/77

---

1

[REDACTED] furnished the interviewing agent the following items pursuant to a subpoena which was served [REDACTED]

---

[REDACTED — entire content of itemized list is obscured by FOIA redaction]

---

Interviewed on 2/23/77 at [REDACTED], Virginia File # SE 164-81 AX 164-72 by SA [REDACTED][guess: skar] Date dictated 2/23/77

---

This document contains neither recommendations nor conclusions of the FBI. It is the property of the FBI and is loaned to your agency; it and its contents are not to be distributed outside your agency.

DB Cooper-1389

---

b3 b6 b7C

Serials: AX 164-72, SE 164-81

Similar documents

Very similar text — possibly a copy redacted differently, or another memo written from the same template.