SAC Boston to SAC Seattle re NORJAK subject Rex Lee Jaco
Document date 22 December 1971
Report a problem
Email this to [email protected]
Id: Cooper-Part-101:040-040
Subject: Cooper Files: Cooper-Part-101:040-040 Document: Airtel SAC Boston to SAC Seattle re NORJAK subject Rex Lee Jaco Id: Cooper-Part-101:040-040 Page: https://cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-101%3A040-040 What is wrong (title, date, type, which pages belong together, copies)? What does the scan show?
A person reads every report. Corrections are made by hand, to the data — titles, dates, names, which pages belong together — never to the scans, and they can take a while to appear.
FBI 164-81, Vault Part 101 p. 40 (DB Cooper-45466), Airtel, dated 22 Dec 1971 — cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-101%3A040-040
FD-36 (Rev. 5-22-64)
F B I
Date: 12/22/71
Transmit the following in ____________ (Type in plaintext or code) Via ___AIRTEL___ (Priority)
---
TO: SAC, SEATTLE (164-181)
FROM: SAC, BOSTON (164-153) (P)
SUBJECT: NORJAK
RE: REX LEE JACO
---
Re Charlotte teletype to Seattle and Boston dated 12/15/71 and St. Louis airtel to Boston dated 12/6/71.
On 12/17/71, [redacted] Mass. reinterviewed and after reviewing photostatic copies of Mor- ning Report and Company E, print out failed to identify anyone as being individual he remembers as (FNU) [redacted].
[redacted] stated the individual he remembers was named (FNU) [redacted] and REX LEE JACO is not identical with [redacted].
(It is noted that [redacted] was [redacted] [redacted] and the information regarding [redacted] was brought to the attention of the FBI, Boston by an individual who overheard [redacted] talking about [redacted] at a bar.)
---
2 Seattle St. Louis 164-63 (INFO) 1 Charlotte (164-101) 2 Boston AWR:mn (6)
---
164-81-[illegible] SERIALIZED FILED [illegible] DEC [illegible] 1971 FBI - SEATTLE
---
Approved: ___________________________ Sent ___________M Per ___________ Special Agent in Charge DB COOPER-45466
Serials: 164-181, BS 164-153, CE 164-101, SL 164-63