Director to SAC Seattle re laboratory examination of NORJAK items Q35-Q39

This copy: Part 101 p. 194Also filed at Part 92 p. 446 (primary)

This copy’s own title

Director to SAC Seattle re latent examination of Q35 through Q39

Document date 7 January 1972

Part 101page 1941 pageDB Cooper-45657

Another copy of this document is the primary, most legible copy: Part 92 p. 446.

Copies may differ in what was redacted.

Open in FBI Vault (Part 101, page 194 of the PDF)
Report a problem

Email this to [email protected]

Id: Cooper-Part-101:194-194

Subject: Cooper Files: Cooper-Part-101:194-194

Document: Airtel Director to SAC Seattle re latent examination of Q35 through Q39
Id: Cooper-Part-101:194-194
Page: https://cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-101%3A194-194

What is wrong (title, date, type, which pages belong together, copies)?


What does the scan show?

Open in email app

A person reads every report. Corrections are made by hand, to the data — titles, dates, names, which pages belong together — never to the scans, and they can take a while to appear.

FBI 164-81, Vault Part 101 p. 194 (DB Cooper-45657), Airtel, dated 7 Jan 1972 — cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-101%3A194-194

Airtel

1-7-72 To: SAC, Seattle (164-81)

From: Director, FBI (164-2111)

NORJAK

Reurlet 12-21-71 submitting envelope, Q35, and letter, Q36, and your airtel 12-30-71 submitting envelope, Q37, letter, Q38, and Membership Application of United States Parachute Association, Q39.

Enclosed specimens further described separate Laboratory report.

One latent fingerprint developed Q38 and two latent fingerprints developed Q39. No latent prints of value developed remaining specimens.

Latent fingerprints not identical fingerprints per- sons previously named for comparison this case.

Enc. (5)

1 - Portland (164-41)

---

118 A 4 [guess: 163]

---

[guess: Sub] 130 164-81- [illegible] SEARCHED ......... INDEXED .... SERIALIZED .... FILED .... JAN 10 1972 FBI - SEATTLE

---

DB COOPER-45657

Serials: 164-2111, PD 164-41, SE 164-81

Similar documents

Very similar text — possibly a copy redacted differently, or another memo written from the same template.