Nitel San Francisco re NORJAK suspect questioned in Kansas City
This copy: Part 101 p. 386Also filed at Part 101 p. 411 (primary) · Part 101 p. 359
This copy’s own title
San Francisco to Seattle re NORJAK subject questioned in Kansas City (first page only)
Document date 11 December 1971
Another copy of this document is the primary, most legible copy: Part 101 p. 411.
Copies may differ in what was redacted.
Report a problem
Email this to [email protected]
Id: Cooper-Part-101:386-386
Subject: Cooper Files: Cooper-Part-101:386-386 Document: Teletype San Francisco to Seattle re NORJAK subject questioned in Kansas City (first page only) Id: Cooper-Part-101:386-386 Page: https://cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-101%3A386-386 What is wrong (title, date, type, which pages belong together, copies)? What does the scan show?
A person reads every report. Corrections are made by hand, to the data — titles, dates, names, which pages belong together — never to the scans, and they can take a while to appear.
FBI 164-81, Vault Part 101 p. 386 (DB Cooper-45879), Teletype, dated 11 Dec 1971, serial SE 164-81-7070 (as read from the transcript) — cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-101%3A386-386
NR 005 SF PLAINTEXT 7:09PM NITEL 12/11/71 JAK TO SEATTLE (164-81) LOS ANGELES (164-497) KANSAS CITY (164-88) PORTLAND (164-41) FROM SAN FRANCISCO (64-220) IP
---
NORJAK.
RE LA TEL TO SE, PD, KC, AND SF, DEC. NINE, LAST, RE [REDACTED] [REDACTED]
[REDACTED] ADVISED INSTANT DATE [REDACTED] [REDACTED] KANSAS CITY, QUESTIONING THE FBI INQUIRY CONCERNING HIM. HE ADVISED THAT HE WOULD NOT TALK TO FBI AGENTS PRIOR TO SEEING HIS LAWYER, AND THAT HE HAD NOTHING TO DO WITH ANY HIJACKING. [REDACTED] [REDACTED], KANSAS CITY, KC ATTEMPT TO CONTACT [REDACTED] [REDACTED] AND ASCERTAIN WHEREABOUTS OF [REDACTED] ON NOV. TWENTY FOUR, LAST.
---
------SUBJECT SHOULD BE CONSIDERED ARMED AND DANGEROUS------ END... DCA FBI SEATTLE CLR
---
SEARCHED___INDEXED___ SERIALIZED___FILED___ DEC 10 1971 FBI-SEATTLE
---
DB COOPER-45879
---
164-81 - 7070
Serials: CV 164-88, LA 164-497, PD 164-41, SE 164-81, SE 164-81-7070
Similar documents
Very similar text — possibly a copy redacted differently, or another memo written from the same template.