Urgent teletype Portland to Seattle re NORJAK suspect airtels from Pittsburgh, Miami and Sacramento

Document date 23 December 1971

Part 102page 2451 pageDB Cooper-46233

Open in FBI Vault (Part 102, page 245 of the PDF)
Report a problem

Email this to [email protected]

Id: Cooper-Part-102:245-245

Subject: Cooper Files: Cooper-Part-102:245-245

Document: Urgent teletype Portland to Seattle re NORJAK suspect airtels from Pittsburgh, Miami and Sacramento
Id: Cooper-Part-102:245-245
Page: https://cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-102%3A245-245

What is wrong (title, date, type, which pages belong together, copies)?


What does the scan show?

Open in email app

A person reads every report. Corrections are made by hand, to the data — titles, dates, names, which pages belong together — never to the scans, and they can take a while to appear.

FBI 164-81, Vault Part 102 p. 245 (DB Cooper-46233), Teletype, dated 23 Dec 1971, serial SE 164-81-1509 (as read from the transcript) — cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-102%3A245-245

[handwritten] Sug [illegible line]

---

NR 002 PD PLAIN 11:42 AM URGENT 12-23-71 LJQ TO: SEATTLE (164-81 PITTSBURGH, (164-93) MINNEAPOLIS (164-73) MIAMI (164-552) FROM: PORTLAND (164-41) IP

NORJAK.

RE PITTSBURGH AIRTEL TO CHICAGO, DECEMBER FIFTEEN SEVENTYONE; MIAMI AIRTEL TO SEATTLE, DECEMBER FIFTEEN SEVENTYONE; AND SACRAMENTO AIRTEL TO SEATTLE, DECEMBER SIXTEEN SEVENTYONE. SUSPECTS: JAMES CONRAD CLIFFORD [redacted] 165 [redacted] [redacted] [redacted] GEORGE BRYAN SIEGRIST, JR. 202 WITNESSES [redacted] NORTHWEST ORIENT AIRLINES, PORTLAND, OREGON, VIEWED PICTURES OF ABOVE SUSPECTS AND DID NOT RECOGNIZE ANY AS THE HIJACKER. [redacted] SAID SUSPECT [redacted] HAD FACIAL FEATURES WHICH IN GENERAL RESEMBLED HIJACKER BUT HE IS NOT HIJACKER. END SLA FBI SEATTLE CLR

---

SEARCHED_____ INDEX_____ SERIALIZED_____ FIL DEC 2 3 1971 FBI - SEATTLE

---

b6 b7C

---

[guess: 164-81-1509] [guess: Still 165]

---

DB COOPER-46233

Serials: MM 164-552, MP 164-73, PD 164-41, PG 164-93, SE 164-81, SE 164-81-1509

Similar documents

Very similar text — possibly a copy redacted differently, or another memo written from the same template.