Las Vegas to Sacramento and Seattle re NORJAK suspect lead

Document date 8 December 1971

Part 102page 3681 pageDB Cooper-46368

Open in FBI Vault (Part 102, page 368 of the PDF)
Report a problem

Email this to [email protected]

Id: Cooper-Part-102:368-368

Subject: Cooper Files: Cooper-Part-102:368-368

Document: Teletype Las Vegas to Sacramento and Seattle re NORJAK suspect lead
Id: Cooper-Part-102:368-368
Page: https://cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-102%3A368-368

What is wrong (title, date, type, which pages belong together, copies)?


What does the scan show?

Open in email app

A person reads every report. Corrections are made by hand, to the data — titles, dates, names, which pages belong together — never to the scans, and they can take a while to appear.

FBI 164-81, Vault Part 102 p. 368 (DB Cooper-46368), Teletype, dated 8 Dec 1971 — cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-102%3A368-368

NR 002 LV PLAIN 1135 AM URGENT 12-8-71 EB TO SACRAMENTO 164-50 SEATTLE 164-81 FROM LAS VEGAS 164-60

---

UNSUB: AKA DAN COOPER; NORTHWEST AIRLINES FLIGHT NUMBER THREE ZERO FIVE, PORTLAND TO SEATTLE, NOVEMBER TWENTY-FOUR, SEVENTY- ONE, CAA - HIJACKING; EXTORTION. OO: SEATTLE.

---

RE SACRAMENTO TEL DECEMBER SEVEN LAST RE SUSPECT [REDACTED] IT IS NOTED INFORMATION FROM [REDACTED] [REDACTED] SHOULD IMMEDIATED BE INTERVIEWED AND IT IS DETERMINED [REDACTED] TOOK PLACE. DESCRIPTION OF [REDACTED] AS GIVEN BY [REDACTED] AR VARIANCE WITH THAT AVAILABLE IN SACRAMENTO FILES IN THAT HAIR IS DIFFERENT. FURTHER, IT IS NOT KNOWN WHETHER DESCRIPTION GIVEN BY [REDACTED] OF [REDACTED] WAS THAT AT THE TIME HE KNEW [REDACTED]. WHEN INTERVIEWING [REDACTED], SACRMENTO SHOULD INSURE COMPOSITE OF UNSUB SHOWN TO HIM AND FULL DETAILS AS TO WHY HE BELIEVES UNSUB MAY BE IDENTICAL WITH [REDACTED].

---

END CORRECTION PLS LINE 6 OF TEXT SEOXXSECOND TO LAST WORD SLD BE AT END VAB FBI SEATTLE CLR

---

DB COOPER-46368 SEARCHED......INDEXED... SERIALIZED...FILED... DEC 8 1971 FBI - SEATTLE

---

b6 b7C b7D

Serials: LV 164-60, SC 164-50, SE 164-81

Similar documents

Very similar text — possibly a copy redacted differently, or another memo written from the same template.