SA to SAC Seattle re Post-Intelligencer Secret Witness letter naming John E. List
Document date 29 March 1972
Report a problem
Email this to [email protected]
Id: Cooper-Part-103:169-170
Subject: Cooper Files: Cooper-Part-103:169-170 Document: Memo SA to SAC Seattle re Post-Intelligencer Secret Witness letter naming John E. List Id: Cooper-Part-103:169-170 Page: https://cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-103%3A169-170 What is wrong (title, date, type, which pages belong together, copies)? What does the scan show?
A person reads every report. Corrections are made by hand, to the data — titles, dates, names, which pages belong together — never to the scans, and they can take a while to appear.
FBI 164-81, Vault Part 103 pp. 169–170 (DB Cooper-46619–46620), Memo, dated 29 Mar 1972 — cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-103%3A169-170
OPTIONAL FORM NO. 10 MAY 1962 EDITION GSA FPMR (41 CFR) 101-11.6 UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT Memorandum
TO : SAC, SEATTLE (164-81) DATE: 3/29/72
FROM : SA [REDACTED] b6 b7C
SUBJECT: NORJAK
---
Attached is a copy of a letter received by the SEATTLE POST INTELLIGENCER in response to their Secret Witness program setting forth information concerning captioned matter. This letter was furnished by [REDACTED] [REDACTED] of the POST INTELLIGENCER.
JSD:klb (3)
---
[signature/initials - illegible]
---
g [guess: envelope]
---
164-81- [guess: 2597] sub 203 SEARCHED _____ INDEXED SERIALIZED [guess: AM] FILED [guess: CM] ........ [guess: APR] 0 1972 FBI-SEATTLE
---
Buy U.S. Savings Bonds Regularly on the Payroll Savings Plan
DB COOPER-46619
[illegible handwritten mark or initials]
---
[redacted]
---
I have been struck by the resemblance between D. B. Cooper the highjacker and John E. List of Westfield, New Jersey accused of murdering his family.
I believe they are the same man.
The age seems right. The contour of the head and hairline seems right.
There is a pattern in the cleverness and coolness of the way he carefully planned both crimes.
---
DB COOPER-46620
Serials: SE 164-81
Similar documents
Very similar text — possibly a copy redacted differently, or another memo written from the same template.