Urgent teletype Minneapolis to WFO and Seattle re phone tip from NWA employee

Document date 15 December 1971

Part 103page 3161 pageDB Cooper-46772

Open in FBI Vault (Part 103, page 316 of the PDF)
Report a problem

Email this to [email protected]

Id: Cooper-Part-103:316-316

Subject: Cooper Files: Cooper-Part-103:316-316

Document: Urgent teletype Minneapolis to WFO and Seattle re phone tip from NWA employee
Id: Cooper-Part-103:316-316
Page: https://cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-103%3A316-316

What is wrong (title, date, type, which pages belong together, copies)?


What does the scan show?

Open in email app

A person reads every report. Corrections are made by hand, to the data — titles, dates, names, which pages belong together — never to the scans, and they can take a while to appear.

FBI 164-81, Vault Part 103 p. 316 (DB Cooper-46772), Teletype, dated 15 Dec 1971, serial SE 164-81-1238 (as read from the transcript) — cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-103%3A316-316

NR003 MP PLAIN 444PM URGENT 12-15-71 MAW TO WASHINGTON FIELD (164-169) SEATTLE (164-81) FROM MINNEAPOLIS (164-73) 1P

NORJAK.

[REDACTED] [handwritten: Source] [REDACTED], NWA, MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA, ADVISED ON DECEMBER FOURTEEN LAST HE RECEIVED A PHONE CALL FROM [REDACTED] [REDACTED] WEST VIRGINIA, WASHINGTON, DC PHONE NUMBER [REDACTED] HOME PHONE .AREA CODE [REDACTED] [REDACTED] ADVISED HE RECENTLY CONTACTED SPECIAL AGENE OF FBI [REDACTED] WDC, AND ADVISED OF IDENTITY OF FORMER PARATROOPER HE CONSIDERS A POSSIBLE SUSPECT IN CONNECTION WITH HIJACKING, AS THIS SUSPECT APPEARS IDENTICAL TO ARTIST'S CONCEPTION PUBLISHED BY NEWS MEDIA.

WFO ADVISE MINNEAPOLIS AND SEATTLE RESULTS OF INVESTIGATION CONCERNING THIS SUSPECT.

UNSUB CONSIDERED DANGEROUS.

P.

END

VAB

FBI SEATTLE CLR

---

164-81- [guess: 1238] SEARCHED .... INDEXED .... SERIALIZED ... FILED ... DEC 15 1971 FBI - SEATTLE

---

DB COOPER-46772

---

b6 b7C b7D

Serials: MP 164-73, SE 164-81, SE 164-81-1238, WF 164-169

Similar documents

Very similar text — possibly a copy redacted differently, or another memo written from the same template.