To file re Boeing employee telephone call naming former worker
Document date 21 December 1971
Report a problem
Email this to [email protected]
Id: Cooper-Part-104:189-189
Subject: Cooper Files: Cooper-Part-104:189-189 Document: Memo to file re Boeing employee telephone call naming former worker Id: Cooper-Part-104:189-189 Page: https://cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-104%3A189-189 What is wrong (title, date, type, which pages belong together, copies)? What does the scan show?
A person reads every report. Corrections are made by hand, to the data — titles, dates, names, which pages belong together — never to the scans, and they can take a while to appear.
FBI 164-81, Vault Part 104 p. 189 (DB Cooper-47152), Memo, dated 21 Dec 1971, serial SE 164-81-1438 (as read from the transcript) — cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-104%3A189-189
FILE (164-81) December 21, 1971
SAC J. E. MILNES
NORJACK
RE [REDACTED] - SUSPECT
---
[REDACTED] of the Boeing Company, telephone [REDACTED] called on December 21, 1971, and advised that in response to a letter we had written to the Boeing Company, he recalls having a [REDACTED] working for him who he fired in 1962 or 1963 for unbecoming conduct. He said that [REDACTED] bears a very strong resemblance to the hijacker, had a swarthy complexion, had either a glass eye or a cocked eye, was a pilot and a motorcycle rider. He endeavored to locate his file but was unable to do so. For some strange, inexplainable reason, it has apparently disappeared.
I told him I would have an Agent contact him in the immediate future concerning this matter.
[REDACTED] should be contacted in person and this matter discussed with him in detail. Further, an effort should be made through the Boeing Company to locate [REDACTED] file so it may be reviewed.
---
2 - Seattle JEM/cjw (2)
---
164-81-1438 SEARCHED ......... INDEXED ........ SER. [illegible] FILED ...... [illegible] 1971 FBI—SEATTLE DB COOPER-47152
---
b6 b7C
Serials: SE 164-81, SE 164-81-1438
Similar documents
Very similar text — possibly a copy redacted differently, or another memo written from the same template.