SAC Springfield to SAC Seattle re NORJAK, enclosing FD-302
Document date 10 February 1992
Report a problem
Email this to [email protected]
Id: Cooper-Part-106:129-129
Subject: Cooper Files: Cooper-Part-106:129-129 Document: Airtel SAC Springfield to SAC Seattle re NORJAK, enclosing FD-302 Id: Cooper-Part-106:129-129 Page: https://cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-106%3A129-129 What is wrong (title, date, type, which pages belong together, copies)? What does the scan show?
A person reads every report. Corrections are made by hand, to the data — titles, dates, names, which pages belong together — never to the scans, and they can take a while to appear.
FBI 164-81, Vault Part 106 p. 129 (DB Cooper-48419), Airtel, dated 10 Feb 1992, serial SE 164-81-9103 (as read from the transcript) — cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-106%3A129-129
FD-36 (Rev. 11-17-88)
FBI
TRANSMIT VIA: PRECEDENCE: CLASSIFICATION: ☐ Teletype ☐ Immediate ☐ TOP SECRET ☐ Facsimile ☐ Priority ☐ SECRET ☒ AIRTEL ☐ Routine ☐ CONFIDENTIAL ☐ UNCLAS E F T O ☐ UNCLAS
Date 2/10/92
---
TO : SAC, SEATTLE (164A-81)
FROM : SAC, Springfield (164A-81) (RUC)
SUBJECT : NORJAK; OO: SEATTLE
Re telcal of SA [REDACTED] Carbondale RA, Springfield Division to SA [REDACTED] on 1/31/92.
Enclosed for the Seattle Division is the original and two copies of FD-302 reflecting interview of [REDACTED] [REDACTED] and interview notes.
---
(2) Seattle (164A-81) (1) Springfield (164A-81)
GHC/bbs (3)
---
INDICES MANUAL FOIMS REF CONFIDENTIAL
---
164A-81-9103 SEARCHED......... INDEXED........ SERIALIZED......... FILED........
FEB 1 4 1992
W/ENC. DB COOPER-48419
---
b6 b7C
---
Approved: _______________ Transmitted _______________ Per _______________ (Number) (Time)
Serials: SE 164-81, SE 164-81-9103
Similar documents
Very similar text — possibly a copy redacted differently, or another memo written from the same template.