SAC Omaha to SAC Seattle re NORJAK source contact in Cedar Rapids
Document date 21 January 1992
Part of: SAC Omaha to SAC Seattle re NORJAK, Cedar Rapids source on Bernard Cooper
Report a problem
Email this to [email protected]
Id: Cooper-Part-107:027-027
Subject: Cooper Files: Cooper-Part-107:027-027 Document: Airtel SAC Omaha to SAC Seattle re NORJAK source contact in Cedar Rapids Id: Cooper-Part-107:027-027 Page: https://cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-107%3A027-027 What is wrong (title, date, type, which pages belong together, copies)? What does the scan show?
A person reads every report. Corrections are made by hand, to the data — titles, dates, names, which pages belong together — never to the scans, and they can take a while to appear.
FBI 164-81, Vault Part 107 p. 27 (DB Cooper-48499), Airtel, dated 21 Jan 1992, serial 164A-SE-81 (as read from the transcript) — cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-107%3A027-027
FD-36 (Rev. 11-17-88)
FBI
TRANSMIT VIA: PRECEDENCE: CLASSIFICATION: ☐ Teletype ☐ Immediate ☐ TOP SECRET ☐ Facsimile ☐ Priority ☐ SECRET ☒ AIRTEL ☐ Routine ☐ CONFIDENTIAL ☐ UNCLAS E F T O ☐ UNCLAS
Date 1/21/92
---
TO : SAC, SEATTLE
FROM : SAC, OMAHA (164A-SE-81) (RUC)
SUBJECT : NORJAK OO: SEATTLE
Re Denver airtel to Omaha dated 11/20/91.
On 1/7/92, contact was made with [REDACTED] (Protect Identity), [REDACTED] Cedar Rapids, Iowa, telephone number [REDACTED], in connection with possible knowledge of D. B. COOPER. [REDACTED] thought an individual known to her as BERNARD D. COOPER of Cedar Rapids was D. B. COOPER.
Upon talking with [REDACTED] it was learned that she knew an individual named [REDACTED] whom she met through her [REDACTED] advised that [REDACTED] had always said he lived in the Council Bluffs area but unknown exactly where. [REDACTED] on a wild hunch, checked the Cedar Rapids directories and came up with BERNARD COOPER and thought [REDACTED] and BERNARD COOPER were one and the same. [REDACTED] never bothered to check any further to see if the [REDACTED] even resembled each other.
After [REDACTED] initially reported the information to Denver, and before investigating Agent contacted her, she happened to see BERNARD COOPER and realized he was not the same person known to her as [REDACTED]
---
(2)- Seattle 2 - Omaha SJH:so (4)
---
164A-SE-81-9100 SEARCHED _______ INDEXED _______ SERIALIZED _______ Approved: _______ Transmitted _______ (Number) (Time) Per JAN 3 1 1992
---
DB COOPER-48499
Serials: 164A-SE-81, 164A-SE-81-9100