Interview re negative records check, Colorado Springs

Interviewed 30 March 1972Dictated 6 April 1972Transcribed 12 April 1972

Part 107page 1161 pageDB Cooper-48778

Open in FBI Vault (Part 107, page 116 of the PDF)
Report a problem

Email this to [email protected]

Id: Cooper-Part-107:116-116

Subject: Cooper Files: Cooper-Part-107:116-116

Document: FD-302 interview re negative records check, Colorado Springs
Id: Cooper-Part-107:116-116
Page: https://cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-107%3A116-116

What is wrong (title, date, type, which pages belong together, copies)?


What does the scan show?

Open in email app

A person reads every report. Corrections are made by hand, to the data — titles, dates, names, which pages belong together — never to the scans, and they can take a while to appear.

FBI 164-81, Vault Part 107 p. 116 (DB Cooper-48778), FD-302 interview, interviewed 30 Mar 1972, serial SE 164-81-2987 (as read from the transcript) — cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-107%3A116-116

FD-302 (REV. 11-27-70)

FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION

Date of transcription 4/12/72

---

1.

[REDACTED] Colorado Springs, Colorado, advised that a check of the records for [REDACTED] failed to reveal either [REDACTED] at the [REDACTED] during November of 1971, by the name of [REDACTED] or anything similar to this name.

[REDACTED] advised that the name JASON T. LANGSETH was unfamiliar to her. [REDACTED] also stated that she is unfamiliar with ABCO, Incorporated, and recalls no salesman for that company inquiring at the [REDACTED]

---

Sub 327 164-81-2987

---

Interviewed on 3/30/72 at Colorado Springs, Colorado File # Denver 164-98 -

by SA [REDACTED] CW Date dictated 4/6/72

This document contains neither recommendations nor conclusions of the FBI. It is the property of the FBI and is loaned to your agency; it and its contents are not to be distributed outside your agency. DB COOPER-48778

---

b6 b7C

Serials: SE 164-81-2987

Similar documents

Very similar text — possibly a copy redacted differently, or another memo written from the same template.