SAC Portland to SAC Seattle re NORJAK
Document date 4 October 1972
Part of: SAC Portland to SAC Seattle re revised color artist's conception shown to witnesses
Report a problem
Email this to [email protected]
Id: Cooper-Part-107:220-220
Subject: Cooper Files: Cooper-Part-107:220-220 Document: Airtel SAC Portland to SAC Seattle re NORJAK Id: Cooper-Part-107:220-220 Page: https://cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-107%3A220-220 What is wrong (title, date, type, which pages belong together, copies)? What does the scan show?
A person reads every report. Corrections are made by hand, to the data — titles, dates, names, which pages belong together — never to the scans, and they can take a while to appear.
FBI 164-81, Vault Part 107 p. 220 (DB Cooper-48932), Airtel, dated 4 Oct 1972, serial SE 164-81-3968 (as read from the transcript) — cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-107%3A220-220
FBI Date: 10/4/72
Transmit the following in _____ (Type in plaintext or code) Via AIRTEL AIRMAIL (Priority)
---
TO: SAC, SEATTLE (164-81) FROM: SAC, PORTLAND (164-41) (P) SUBJECT: NORJAK
---
SWB K SWS E SWS 277
---
For information of Seattle, the recent artist's conception of Unsub in this matter in color has been dis- played to Portland witnesses [REDACTED] Northwest Air- lines. Both advised the modified conception no longer resembles their recollections of Unsub. Both further advised they were not completely satisfied with the prior conception but that it was much closer than the revised copy.
For further information, photographs of the following suspects were displayed to these two witnesses and they stated there was no resemblance to Unsub:
ANTHONY LAMBERT COLE; 277
---
(2) - Seattle 3 - Portland
RPH:sag (4)
---
164-81 - 3968 SEARCHED______INDEXED______ SERIALIZED____ FILED____ OCT 5 1972 FBI—SEATTLE
---
Approved: [signature] Special Agent in Charge Sent ______ M Per ______ *U.S.Government Printing Office: 1972 — 455-574 DB COOPER-48932
Serials: PD 164-41, SE 164-81, SE 164-81-3968
Similar documents
Very similar text — possibly a copy redacted differently, or another memo written from the same template.