Nitel teletype New York to Seattle re Pan American interview on NORJAK composite
Document date 18 February 1972
Report a problem
Email this to [email protected]
Id: Cooper-Part-108:041-041
Subject: Cooper Files: Cooper-Part-108:041-041 Document: Nitel teletype New York to Seattle re Pan American interview on NORJAK composite Id: Cooper-Part-108:041-041 Page: https://cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-108%3A041-041 What is wrong (title, date, type, which pages belong together, copies)? What does the scan show?
A person reads every report. Corrections are made by hand, to the data — titles, dates, names, which pages belong together — never to the scans, and they can take a while to appear.
FBI 164-81, Vault Part 108 p. 41 (DB Cooper-49006), Teletype, dated 18 Feb 1972, serial SE 164-81-2446 (as read from the transcript) — cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-108%3A041-041
FBI Date: 2/18/72
smit the following in ___Plaintext___ (Type in plaintext or code) TELETYPE ___Nitel___ (Priority)
---
TO SAC SEATTLE FROM SAC NEW YORK (164-627)
NORJAK
REFERENCE ATLANTA TELETYPE TO NEW YORK, DATED TWO FOURTEEN SEVENTY TWO.
[REDACTED], PAN AMERICAN WORLD AIRWAYS, WAS INTERVIEWED AND ADVISED THE ARTIST'S CONCEPTION OF UNSUB WAS FAMILIAR TO HIM AT THE PRESENT TIME. HE STATED HE WOULD NOT MAKE A POSITIVE IDENTIFICATION OF THIS SKETCH HOWEVER HE WOULD KEEP A COPY OF THE SKETCH AND IN THE EVENT ANY SIMILARITIES ARE NOTED AMONG PAN AMERICAN PILOTS WITH WHOM HE COMES IN CONTACT, [illegible]
---
ON TWO SIXTEEN LAST, [REDACTED] OVERSEAS NATIONAL AIRWAYS, WAS CONTACTED REGARDING SUBJECT [REDACTED] ADVISED THAT AFTER A THOROUGH
---
1-New York 1-Atlanta (INFO)(164-254)(AM) 1-Kansas City (AM) 1-Miami (AM) 1-#28 GVN:dmg (5) Approved: ___[signature]___ Sent ___ Per ___ Special Agent in Charge
---
164-81-2446 FEB 1 8 1972 FBI SEATTLE DB COOPER-49006
Serials: AT 164-254, NY 164-627, SE 164-81-2446
Similar documents
Very similar text — possibly a copy redacted differently, or another memo written from the same template.