Seattle to Los Angeles re photographs forwarded by courier of possible identical subject
Document date 23 April 1972
Also filed at: Part 111 p. 125
Copies may differ in what was redacted.
Report a problem
Email this to [email protected]
Id: Cooper-Part-109:051-051
Subject: Cooper Files: Cooper-Part-109:051-051 Document: Teletype Seattle to Los Angeles re photographs forwarded by courier of possible identical subject Id: Cooper-Part-109:051-051 Page: https://cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-109%3A051-051 What is wrong (title, date, type, which pages belong together, copies)? What does the scan show?
A person reads every report. Corrections are made by hand, to the data — titles, dates, names, which pages belong together — never to the scans, and they can take a while to appear.
FBI 164-81, Vault Part 109 p. 51 (DB Cooper-49509), Teletype, dated 23 Apr 1972, serial SE 164-81-2659 (as read from the transcript) — cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-109%3A051-051
FD-36 (Rev. 5-22-64)
FBI
Date: 4/23/72
Transmit the following in __________ (Type in plaintext or code) Via TELETYPE [handwritten: cursive priority notation] (Priority)
---
TO SAC, LOS ANGELES
FROM SAC, SEATTLE (164-81)
NORJAK
RE: [REDACTED] - SOURCE
SEATTLE IS SENDING BY COURIER TODAY PHOTOGRAPHS OF [REDACTED]. IT IS BELIEVED [REDACTED] MAY BE IDENTICAL WITH THE [REDACTED] WHO PARTICIPATED IN THE MEETING AT SEATTLE ON FEB. TWENTYTHREE, SEVENTYTWO. IN INTERVIEW WITH [REDACTED] HE INDICATED, ALTHOUGH DID NOT STATE DEFINITELY THAT AN ACQUAINTANCE, [REDACTED] MAY HAVE BEEN THE HIJACKER. EXHIBIT PHOTO OF [REDACTED] TO DETERMINE IF IDENTICAL WITH [REDACTED] EXHIBIT PHOTO OF [REDACTED] TO DETERMINE IF THEY CONSIDER HIM IDENTICAL WITH UNSUB WHO WAS PHOTOGRAPHED AT SEATTLE. LA WILL BE ADVISED TELEPHONICALLY OF PLANE SCHEDULE.
PRB:jlb (1)
---
164-81-2659
---
Approved: ________ Special Agent in Charge Sent ________ M Per ________ U. S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE: 1971—413—135 DB COOPER-49509
---
002
Serials: SE 164-81, SE 164-81-2659