SAC Kansas City to SAC Seattle re NORJACK FAA inquiry

Document date 4 April 1972

Part 109page 3601 pageDB Cooper-49872

Open in FBI Vault (Part 109, page 360 of the PDF)
Report a problem

Email this to [email protected]

Id: Cooper-Part-109:360-360

Subject: Cooper Files: Cooper-Part-109:360-360

Document: Airtel SAC Kansas City to SAC Seattle re NORJACK FAA inquiry
Id: Cooper-Part-109:360-360
Page: https://cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-109%3A360-360

What is wrong (title, date, type, which pages belong together, copies)?


What does the scan show?

Open in email app

A person reads every report. Corrections are made by hand, to the data — titles, dates, names, which pages belong together — never to the scans, and they can take a while to appear.

FBI 164-81, Vault Part 109 p. 360 (DB Cooper-49872), Airtel, dated 4 Apr 1972 — cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-109%3A360-360

4/4/72

---

AIRTEL AIRMAIL

TO: SAC, SEATTLE (164-81)

FROM: SAC, KANSAS CITY (164-00) P

NORJACK

RE [REDACTED]

Re Oklahoma City airtel to Butte, 3/9/72.

On 3/29/72, [REDACTED] FAA, 601 East 12th Street, Kansas City, Missouri, advised SC [REDACTED] that information obtained at FAA, Oklahoma City, does not conform to FAA policy regarding training procedures. [REDACTED] explained that the FAA has not nor do they presently train aircraft dispatchers for ultimate employment with any commercial air carrier, such as Northwest Airlines. It was conjecture on [REDACTED] part that [REDACTED] at FAA, Oklahoma City, and [REDACTED] [REDACTED] also advised the actual examination papers would possibly be maintained at FAA, Oklahoma City, if they have not been destroyed by this time.

---

ELIMINATI[VE]

---

(2) Seattle 1 Butte (Info.) 2 Oklahoma City (164-56) 1 Portland (164-41)(Info.) 2 Kansas City JVL:rmb [8]

---

164-81- [date stamp] SEARCHED......INDEXED...... SERIALIZED [UNFILED] [REDACTED] APR 30 1972 FBI - SEATTLE

---

DB COOPER-49872

Serials: 164-0, OC 164-56, PD 164-41, SE 164-81

Similar documents

Very similar text — possibly a copy redacted differently, or another memo written from the same template.