Portland to Seattle re anonymous caller naming possible hijacker (file copy)
Document date 29 November 1971
Report a problem
Email this to [email protected]
Id: Cooper-Part-11:176-176
Subject: Cooper Files: Cooper-Part-11:176-176 Document: Teletype Portland to Seattle re anonymous caller naming possible hijacker (file copy) Id: Cooper-Part-11:176-176 Page: https://cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-11%3A176-176 What is wrong (title, date, type, which pages belong together, copies)? What does the scan show?
A person reads every report. Corrections are made by hand, to the data — titles, dates, names, which pages belong together — never to the scans, and they can take a while to appear.
FBI 164-81, Vault Part 11 p. 176 (DB Cooper-2079), Teletype, dated 29 Nov 1971, serial SE 164-81-232 (as read from the transcript) — cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-11%3A176-176
FBI Date: 11/29/71
nit the following in _____ PLAIN TEXT (Type in plaintext or code) TELETYPE URGENT (Priority)
---
TO: SEATTLE 164-81
FROM: PORTLAND (164-41)
UNSUB; NORTHWEST AIRLINES FLIGHT THREE ZERO FIVE, PORTLAND TO SEATTLE, TWENTYFOURTH INSTANT. CAS - HIJACKING; EXTORTION.
ANONYMOUS MALE CALLER TELEPHONED PORTLAND OFFICE ONE FORTY P.M. TWENTYNINTH INSTANT. STATES DESCRIPTION AND ARTISTS CONCEPTION IN LOCAL NEWSPAPER STRONGLY RESEMBLE ONE [REDACTED] IS ABOUT FIFTY AND HAIR IS LIGHT BROWN, OTHERWISE FITS DESCRIPTION OF UNSUB. [REDACTED] NAMED [REDACTED] SOME YEARS AGO [REDACTED] [REDACTED] CALIFORNIA. NOW BELIEVED RESIDING IN SEATTLE AREA.
INFORMANT STATES [REDACTED] HENCE WONT GIVE NAME. HE WOULD FURNISH NO FURTHER DESCRIPTION OR DETAILS. SAYS [REDACTED] TO HIS KNOWLEDGE.
---
(1)
[signature/stamp area] Special Agent in Charge
164-81-232 NOV 29 1971 Sent _______ M Per ________ U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE
DB Cooper-2079
Serials: PD 164-41, SE 164-81, SE 164-81-232
Similar documents
Very similar text — possibly a copy redacted differently, or another memo written from the same template.