SAC Seattle to Director re 1989 annual NORJAK status report
This copy: Part 110 p. 376Also filed at Part 103 p. 168 (primary)
This copy’s own title
SAC Seattle to Director, 1989 annual NORJAK status report
Document date 13 February 1990
Another copy of this document is the primary, most legible copy: Part 103 p. 168.
Copies may differ in what was redacted.
Report a problem
Email this to [email protected]
Id: Cooper-Part-110:376-376
Subject: Cooper Files: Cooper-Part-110:376-376 Document: Airtel SAC Seattle to Director, 1989 annual NORJAK status report Id: Cooper-Part-110:376-376 Page: https://cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-110%3A376-376 What is wrong (title, date, type, which pages belong together, copies)? What does the scan show?
A person reads every report. Corrections are made by hand, to the data — titles, dates, names, which pages belong together — never to the scans, and they can take a while to appear.
FBI 164-81, Vault Part 110 p. 376 (DB Cooper-50018), Airtel, dated 13 Feb 1990, serial SE 164-81-4141 (as read from the transcript) — cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-110%3A376-376
FD-36 (Rev. 8-29-85)
FBI
TRANSMIT VIA: PRECEDENCE: CLASSIFICATION: ☐ Teletype ☐ Immediate ☐ TOP SECRET ☐ Facsimile ☐ Priority ☐ SECRET ☒ AIRTEL ☐ Routine ☐ CONFIDENTIAL ☐ UNCLAS E F T O ☐ UNCLAS
Date 2/13/90
---
1 TO : DIRECTOR, FBI (164-2111) 2 FROM : SAC, SEATTLE (164A-81) (P) 3 SUBJECT: NORJAK OO: SEATTLE 4 5 NORJAK Suspects at Start of 1989: 1,003 6 NORJAK Suspects at End of 1989: 1,041 7 Number of Suspects Processed and Eliminated During the Year: 24 8 Occasionally, suspects are reopened because new 9 evidence indicates a "second look" is warranted. One suspect that received national press coverage was JOHN EMIL LIST 10 (Suspect 203). 11 LIST was considered a suspect because he became a fugitive 15 days prior to NORJAK. He matches the general 12 description of UNSUB, also known as DAN COOPER. He killed his family partially because he was despondent over monetary 13 problems. He served in the military and may have had airborne training. 14 The Newark Division advised by airtel dated 7/24/89, 15 that a review of LIST's U.S. Army records reflect no receipt by LIST of airborne training. A review of suspect File 203 16 reflected that LIST's photograph has been displayed to the three victim stewardesses. All three stated that LIST was not 17 .identical to UNSUB. 18 No further investigation will be conducted by Seattle concerning JOHN EMIL LIST. 19 ARMED AND DANGEROUS 20 21 2 - Bureau (2)- Seattle RKN:jhf (4)
---
Approved: _____________ Transmitted _____________ Per 164A-81-4141 (Number) (Time) SUB 386 DB COOPER-50018
Serials: 164-2111, SE 164-81, SE 164-81-4141