SAC Chicago to SAC Seattle re United Air Lines Las Vegas-Portland connections
Document date 27 April 1972
Report a problem
Email this to [email protected]
Id: Cooper-Part-110:471-471
Subject: Cooper Files: Cooper-Part-110:471-471 Document: Airtel SAC Chicago to SAC Seattle re United Air Lines Las Vegas-Portland connections Id: Cooper-Part-110:471-471 Page: https://cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-110%3A471-471 What is wrong (title, date, type, which pages belong together, copies)? What does the scan show?
A person reads every report. Corrections are made by hand, to the data — titles, dates, names, which pages belong together — never to the scans, and they can take a while to appear.
FBI 164-81, Vault Part 110 p. 471 (DB Cooper-50156), Airtel, dated 27 Apr 1972 — cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-110%3A471-471
4/27/72
---
AIRTEL
TO: SAC, SEATTLE (164-81)
FROM: SAC, CHICAGO (164-297) (P)
SUBJECT: NORJAK RICHARD FLOYD MC COY, JR., aka Dan Cooper D. Cooper J. Johnson
Re San Francisco tel 4/19/72.
---
[guess: UA]
---
United Air Lines (UAL), Elk Grove, Illinois, advised UAL offers no connecting flights from Las Vegas to Portland during November, 1971, and was not a recommended service for those points. A review of the Official Airline guide for August, 1971, through December, 1971, recommends service between Las Vegas and Portland by a three Air West flights and two Western flights, all of which offer direct service between Las Vegas and Portland and are only carriers recommended for service between these points. UAL is not recommended for service between Las Vegas and Portland. In view of this, lead set forth in referenced tel not being covered UAL.
---
(2) - Seattle 1 - Salt Lake City (164-24) 1 - San Francisco (164-220) 1 - Chicago
JWM/pjs (5)
---
[guess: Sub. 386] 164-81- SEARCHED ......... INDEXED ........ SERIALIZED/[guess: MAILED] ........ APR 26 1972 FBI - SEATTLE
---
DB COOPER-50156
---
b6 b7C
Serials: CG 164-297, SE 164-81, SF 164-220, SU 164-24
Similar documents
Very similar text — possibly a copy redacted differently, or another memo written from the same template.