To SAC Seattle re source's NORJAK suspect resembling artist's conception ('CHANGED' subtitle)
This copy: Part 111 p. 195Also filed at Part 26 pp. 215–216 (primary)
This copy’s own title
To SAC Seattle re source's suspect after seeing artist's conception
Document date 2 June 1972
Another copy of this document is the primary, most legible copy: Part 26 pp. 215–216.
Copies may differ in what was redacted.
Report a problem
Email this to [email protected]
Id: Cooper-Part-111:195-195
Subject: Cooper Files: Cooper-Part-111:195-195 Document: Memo to SAC Seattle re source's suspect after seeing artist's conception Id: Cooper-Part-111:195-195 Page: https://cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-111%3A195-195 What is wrong (title, date, type, which pages belong together, copies)? What does the scan show?
A person reads every report. Corrections are made by hand, to the data — titles, dates, names, which pages belong together — never to the scans, and they can take a while to appear.
FBI 164-81, Vault Part 111 p. 195 (DB Cooper-50556), Memo, dated 2 Jun 1972, serial SE 164-81-3500 (as read from the transcript) — cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-111%3A195-195
SAC, SEATTLE (164-81)(P) 6/2/72
SA [REDACTED]
NORJAK OO: SEATTLE
"CHANGED" [REDACTED] SOURCE
---
Subtitle changed to record the name of the suspect offered by [REDACTED]
On 4/28/72, while at [REDACTED] [REDACTED] on another matter, [REDACTED] mentioned a suspect he has had in his mind for some time. He explained that when he saw the artist's conception of the hijacker published in the "Seattle Post Intelligencer" he immediately thought that it resembled [REDACTED] [REDACTED] When questioned concerning other reasons why [REDACTED] might be suspect, he stated there were none. His only connection would be that he looked similar to the drawing. [REDACTED], 5'10" tall, and [REDACTED] He has not had any display of more wealth than usual of late and resides in Tacoma.
[REDACTED] cautioned that, in that [REDACTED] [REDACTED] he would hope that nothing would be done to indicate that he had suggested [REDACTED] name.
It is not felt that the above is sufficient to provide a valid complaint and it is suggested that no further investigation be conducted.
---
JAG:md (3)
[REDACTED] 164-81-[guess: 3500]
---
DB COOPER-50556
Serials: SE 164-81, SE 164-81-3500