SAC Salt Lake City to SAC Denver requesting copy of communication not received

Document date 10 April 1973

Part 111page 4431 pageDB Cooper-50858

Open in FBI Vault (Part 111, page 443 of the PDF)
Report a problem

Email this to [email protected]

Id: Cooper-Part-111:443-443

Subject: Cooper Files: Cooper-Part-111:443-443

Document: Airtel SAC Salt Lake City to SAC Denver requesting copy of communication not received
Id: Cooper-Part-111:443-443
Page: https://cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-111%3A443-443

What is wrong (title, date, type, which pages belong together, copies)?


What does the scan show?

Open in email app

A person reads every report. Corrections are made by hand, to the data — titles, dates, names, which pages belong together — never to the scans, and they can take a while to appear.

FBI 164-81, Vault Part 111 p. 443 (DB Cooper-50858), Airtel, dated 10 Apr 1973, serial 164-31-4620 (as read from the transcript) — cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-111%3A443-443

4/10/73

AIRTEL AIR MAIL

TO: SAC, DENVER (164-38)

FROM: SAC, SALT LAKE CITY (164-24)(P)

RE: NORJAK (OO: SE)

ReSLairtel to AQ, dated 4/3/73, and DN airtel to Bureau, et al, dated 2/22/73.

Salt Lake City not in receipt of referenced communication dated 2/22/73.

Denver requested to furnish Salt Lake City copy of that communication.

ARMED AND DANGEROUS.

---

Sub 4/37 [guess: Hustlen]

---

2 - Denver 1 - Seattle (164-81) 2 - Salt Lake City

RWH:mhe (5)

---

Sub 1/37 164 - [guess: 31] - 4620 SERCH [illegible] BRIM: SERIA. IN [illegible] de TPE 2P7. FIL--SPOOL

---

DB COOPER-50858

Serials: 164-31-4620, 164-38, SE 164-81, SU 164-24

Similar documents

Very similar text — possibly a copy redacted differently, or another memo written from the same template.