To SAC Seattle re Everett source and telephone number check, NORJAK

Document date 14 August 1972

Part 112page 4221 pageDB Cooper-51279

Open in FBI Vault (Part 112, page 422 of the PDF)
Report a problem

Email this to [email protected]

Id: Cooper-Part-112:422-422

Subject: Cooper Files: Cooper-Part-112:422-422

Document: Memo to SAC Seattle re Everett source and telephone number check, NORJAK
Id: Cooper-Part-112:422-422
Page: https://cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-112%3A422-422

What is wrong (title, date, type, which pages belong together, copies)?


What does the scan show?

Open in email app

A person reads every report. Corrections are made by hand, to the data — titles, dates, names, which pages belong together — never to the scans, and they can take a while to appear.

FBI 164-81, Vault Part 112 p. 422 (DB Cooper-51279), Memo, dated 14 Aug 1972, serial SE 164-81-3706 (as read from the transcript) — cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-112%3A422-422

SAC, SEATTLE (164-81) (P) 8/14/72

SA [REDACTED] [REDACTED] b6 b7C NORJAK [REDACTED]

---

Re Seattle memo of [REDACTED] dated 7/25/72.

On August 2, 1972, [REDACTED] (Protect b6 Identity), [REDACTED], Everett, Washington, advised the telephone b7C number [REDACTED] b7D [REDACTED] Bothell, Washington, since Febru- ary, 1967. At that time he worked for Blake Moffett and Towne in Seattle, and listed a relative as [REDACTED] [REDACTED] Seattle, Washington.

The name [REDACTED] was not associated with telephone number [REDACTED]

---

LEAD

SEATTLE

AT KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON

Contact [REDACTED] b6 [REDACTED] Bothell, and determine the present address of [REDACTED] b7C [REDACTED] Thereafter, interview [REDACTED] concerning sub- ject, [REDACTED] whereabouts during the period of captioned hijacking.

---

2/ - Seattle TMK/bjb (2) Agent assigned lead should have copy of Serials 3603, 3656, and 3658. 164-81-[guess: 3706]

[illegible initials] [illegible initials]

---

DB COOPER-51279

Serials: SE 164-81, SE 164-81-3706

Similar documents

Very similar text — possibly a copy redacted differently, or another memo written from the same template.