SAC Cincinnati to SAC Seattle transmitting FD-302 re Cooper identification tip

Document date 6 July 1972

Part 112page 5071 pageDB Cooper-51391

Open in FBI Vault (Part 112, page 507 of the PDF)
Report a problem

Email this to [email protected]

Id: Cooper-Part-112:507-507

Subject: Cooper Files: Cooper-Part-112:507-507

Document: Airtel SAC Cincinnati to SAC Seattle transmitting FD-302 re Cooper identification tip
Id: Cooper-Part-112:507-507
Page: https://cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-112%3A507-507

What is wrong (title, date, type, which pages belong together, copies)?


What does the scan show?

Open in email app

A person reads every report. Corrections are made by hand, to the data — titles, dates, names, which pages belong together — never to the scans, and they can take a while to appear.

FBI 164-81, Vault Part 112 p. 507 (DB Cooper-51391), Airtel, dated 6 Jul 1972, serial SE 164-81-3669 (as read from the transcript) — cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-112%3A507-507

7/6/72

AIRTEL

TO : SAC, SEATTLE

FROM : SAC, CINCINNATI (164-55) (RUC)

SUBJECT: NORJAK; [REDACTED] (Phonetic)

Re CI teletype to Bureau, 7/5/72.

Enclosed for the Seattle Division are 7 copies each of an FD 302 reflecting interview with [REDACTED] Columbus, Ohio, and an investigative insert reflecting interview with [REDACTED] [REDACTED] Seven copies of each of these communications are being enclosed for the Seattle Division due to the fact that they are the office of Origin.

Enclosed for the information of the Anchorage Division are two copies each of the aforementioned FD 302 and investigative insert.

Instant matter was reopened by the Cincinnati Division upon the receipt of information from [REDACTED] [REDACTED] Columbus, Ohio.

The Cincinnati Division is now placing this case in an RUC status.

(2)- Seattle (Enc. 14) 1 - Anchorage (Enc. 4) (Info.) 1 - Cincinnati

CAT:trc (4)

---

164-81-3669 SEARCHED ... INDEXED ... SERIALIZED ... FILED ... JUL 20 1972 FBI - SEATTLE

---

DB COOPER-51391

Serials: CI 164-55, SE 164-81-3669

Similar documents

Very similar text — possibly a copy redacted differently, or another memo written from the same template.