SPC Francis E. Entler to SAC Seattle re NORJAK Sub 507
Document date 3 October 1972
Report a problem
Email this to [email protected]
Id: Cooper-Part-113:232-232
Subject: Cooper Files: Cooper-Part-113:232-232 Document: Memo SPC Francis E. Entler to SAC Seattle re NORJAK Sub 507 Id: Cooper-Part-113:232-232 Page: https://cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-113%3A232-232 What is wrong (title, date, type, which pages belong together, copies)? What does the scan show?
A person reads every report. Corrections are made by hand, to the data — titles, dates, names, which pages belong together — never to the scans, and they can take a while to appear.
FBI 164-81, Vault Part 113 p. 232 (DB Cooper-51777), Memo, dated 3 Oct 1972, serial LV 164-86-3950 (as read from the transcript) — cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-113%3A232-232
SAC, SEATTLE (164-81) 10/3/72
SPC FRANCIS E. ENTLER
NORJAK
---
Sub 507
---
[REDACTED] Sea-Tac Airport telephonically advised he observed an individual instant date who strongly resembled the composite drawing of Dan Cooper. [REDACTED] advised that individual had purchased ticket on Continental flight #309, Seattle to Portland. Individual was in line to board plane when first noticed by [REDACTED] stated that he watched individual who seemed highly nervous. After short time [REDACTED] began to approach man who then broke from line and hurriedly walked away, not returning to board plane.
---
[REDACTED] indicated man purchased one way ticket at Continental reservations to Portland from ticket agent (FNU) [REDACTED] at 3:15 P.M. Subject charged ticket on [REDACTED] issued to [REDACTED] expiration date [REDACTED]
---
[REDACTED] further advised that man wore [guess: glasses] dark glasses similar to those in composite drawing. He also stated that man was not detained because he did not meet the hijacker's profile.
---
FEE/fee (2)
---
Sub 507 164-86-3[guess: 950] [REDACTED] [guess: SEARCHED...INDEXED...FILED] [stamp] OCT 3 1972 [guess: FBI — SEATTLE]
---
DB COOPER-51777
---
b6 b7C
Serials: LV 164-86-3950, SE 164-81
Similar documents
Very similar text — possibly a copy redacted differently, or another memo written from the same template.