SAC Portland to SAC Seattle re NORJAK
Document date 19 August 1975
Report a problem
Email this to [email protected]
Id: Cooper-Part-113:365-365
Subject: Cooper Files: Cooper-Part-113:365-365 Document: Airtel SAC Portland to SAC Seattle re NORJAK Id: Cooper-Part-113:365-365 Page: https://cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-113%3A365-365 What is wrong (title, date, type, which pages belong together, copies)? What does the scan show?
A person reads every report. Corrections are made by hand, to the data — titles, dates, names, which pages belong together — never to the scans, and they can take a while to appear.
FBI 164-81, Vault Part 113 p. 365 (DB Cooper-13773), Airtel, dated 19 Aug 1975 — cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-113%3A365-365
FD-36 (Rev. 2-14-74)
FBI
Date: 8/19/75
Transmit the following in _______________ (Type in plaintext or code)
Via AIRTEL AIRMAIL (Precedence)
---
TO; SAC, SEATTLE (164-81) b6 per FBI b7C per FBI FROM: SAC, PORTLAND (164-41) (P) [REDACTED]
SUBJECT: NORJAK
---
Re Seattle airtel to Portland, dated 7/16/75.
For information of Seattle, [REDACTED] Albany, Oregon, is well-known to the Portland Office. He made several separate allegations concerning identification of UNSUB and location of ransom in this matter. Extensive investigation has resolved them all and no information is known to Portland indicating any possible connection or involvement or knowledge in this case on the part of [REDACTED]
According to the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) authorities at Portland, PROBST is an airplane pilot of many years' experience. He was seriously injured in an airplane crash a number of years ago, suffering head injuries which have disqualified him for licensing in any aviation capacity. FAA files show a record of bizarre behavior. b6 per FBI It is noted that [REDACTED] has made numerous incoherent b7C per FBI telephone calls to Portland Agents and has also authored incoherent letters.
Portland is aware of the [REDACTED] concerning [REDACTED] has previously attempted to draw the Portland Office into involvement in that matter. Portland feels that the information precipitating referenced airtel is in furtherance of those efforts. Accordingly, no further inquiry in this matter should be pursued.
---
(2)- Seattle 2 - Portland
RPH:cam (4)
Approved: [signature]
[stamp] Charge 9-3-75 [initials]
ELIMINATE
[SEARCHED _____ INDEXED _____] [SERIALIZED ___ 164 FILED ___] AUG 9 1975
164-2)-665/
Sent ___________
DB-Cooper-13773
Similar documents
Very similar text — possibly a copy redacted differently, or another memo written from the same template.