SAC Seattle to Acting Director requesting fingerprint comparison for Sender, Sub #547
Document date 4 April 1973
Report a problem
Email this to [email protected]
Id: Cooper-Part-114:277-277
Subject: Cooper Files: Cooper-Part-114:277-277 Document: Airtel SAC Seattle to Acting Director requesting fingerprint comparison for Sender, Sub #547 Id: Cooper-Part-114:277-277 Page: https://cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-114%3A277-277 What is wrong (title, date, type, which pages belong together, copies)? What does the scan show?
A person reads every report. Corrections are made by hand, to the data — titles, dates, names, which pages belong together — never to the scans, and they can take a while to appear.
FBI 164-81, Vault Part 114 p. 277 (DB Cooper-52242), Airtel, dated 4 Apr 1973, serial SE 164-81-4585 (as read from the transcript) — cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-114%3A277-277
Sub 547
---
4/4/73
AIRTEL AIR MAIL
TO: ACTING DIRECTOR, FBI (164-2111) (ATTN: IDENTIFICATION DIVISION)
FROM: SAC, SEATTLE (164-81) (P)
SUBJECT: NORJAK OO: SEATTLE
RE: SUB JAMES LEROY SENDER SUB #547
Re Seattle airtel to Savannah, 12/22/72.
To provide sufficient background information for the Identification Division a copy of referenced communication is being enclosed.
The Identification Division is requested to compare SENDER'S fingerprints with the NORJAK partials currently on file.
---
LEADS
SAVANNAH At Fort Stewart, Georgia
1. Will obtain current and complete descriptive information of SENDER, (of particular interest is his present complexion and age based on appearance).
2. Will discretely conduct a complete financial check on SENDER to obtain his financial status, to determine if he has a safe deposit box and to determine his whereabouts on 11/24/71 from cancelled checks, credit card receipts, or any other appropriate means available.
ARMED AND DANGEROUS
---
2 - Bureau (Enc. 1) [routing symbol] - Seattle 2 - Savannah (164-29) RNN/rse (7) Sub-547 164-81-4585 DB COOPER-52242
Serials: 164-2111, SE 164-81, SE 164-81-4585, SV 164-29
Similar documents
Very similar text — possibly a copy redacted differently, or another memo written from the same template.