Butte insert by SA Joseph H. Servel re Montana interview of 2/13/73
This copy: Part 115 p. 331Also filed at Part 114 p. 390 (primary)
This copy’s own title
Investigative insert by SA Joseph H. Servel re 2/13/73 Montana interview
Document date 13 February 1973
Another copy of this document is the primary, most legible copy: Part 114 p. 390.
Copies may differ in what was redacted.
Part of: Butte insert re 2/13/73 interview at Montana residence on Cooper suspect
Report a problem
Email this to [email protected]
Id: Cooper-Part-115:331-331
Subject: Cooper Files: Cooper-Part-115:331-331 Document: Investigative insert by SA Joseph H. Servel re 2/13/73 Montana interview Id: Cooper-Part-115:331-331 Page: https://cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-115%3A331-331 What is wrong (title, date, type, which pages belong together, copies)? What does the scan show?
A person reads every report. Corrections are made by hand, to the data — titles, dates, names, which pages belong together — never to the scans, and they can take a while to appear.
FBI 164-81, Vault Part 115 p. 331 (DB Cooper-52823), Report, dated 13 Feb 1973, serial SE 164-81-4553 (as read from the transcript) — cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-115%3A331-331
BT #164-26 SE #164-81 JHS/cjs/mhs Page 1
---
The following investigation was conducted by SA JOSEPH H. SERVEL:
AT [REDACTED] MONTANA
Efforts to contact [REDACTED] [REDACTED] on February 9 and 12, 1973, were negative.
On February 13, 1973, [REDACTED] who is [REDACTED] was interviewed at his resi- dence at which time he furnished the following information:
He has discussed the D. B. COOPER hijacking case at length with [REDACTED] a young woman who formerly resided at [REDACTED] and was employed at the [REDACTED] [REDACTED]
[REDACTED] told him about conversations she had had with an individual by the name of [REDACTED] from [REDACTED] Montana. Apparently [REDACTED] and one evening while they were having a few drinks, [REDACTED] started bragging about the fact that he knew D. B. COOPER. Based upon conversations he has had with [REDACTED] he has come to the following conclusions concerning the possible identity of the individual [REDACTED] was referring to:
Mr. X, [REDACTED] went to school with him. [REDACTED] has another friend possibly involved, whom he will identify as Mr. Y. [REDACTED] and Mr. Y are from Minneapolis, Minnesota. Mr. X was raised in [REDACTED] Montana. [REDACTED] told [REDACTED] that his initials are [REDACTED] Mr. X and Mr. Y [REDACTED] said Mr. X has enough money so that he would not have to spend any of the ransom money he received from the hijacking.
Mr. X is a pilot and had worked out of [REDACTED] sometime in 1968. If this is true, he would have had to
---
[handwritten] 16 4- 81- 4553
SEARCHED _____ INDEXED _____ SERIALIZED [illegible] FILED [illegible] [illegible] FBI — S[illegible]
---
DB COOPER-52823
Serials: SE 164-81-4553