SAC Minneapolis to Acting Director and Seattle re Neal Sundberg, enclosing FD-302
This copy: Part 116 pp. 154–155Also filed at Part 112 pp. 208–210 (primary) · Part 115 pp. 381–382 · Part 116 pp. 123–124
This copy’s own title
SAC Minneapolis to Acting Director re suspects Leif E. Hansen and Neal Sundberg
Document date 16 May 1973
Another copy of this document is the primary, most legible copy: Part 112 pp. 208–210.
Copies may differ in what was redacted.
Report a problem
Email this to [email protected]
Id: Cooper-Part-116:154-155
Subject: Cooper Files: Cooper-Part-116:154-155 Document: Airtel SAC Minneapolis to Acting Director re suspects Leif E. Hansen and Neal Sundberg Id: Cooper-Part-116:154-155 Page: https://cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-116%3A154-155 What is wrong (title, date, type, which pages belong together, copies)? What does the scan show?
A person reads every report. Corrections are made by hand, to the data — titles, dates, names, which pages belong together — never to the scans, and they can take a while to appear.
FBI 164-81, Vault Part 116 pp. 154–155 (DB Cooper-53136, DB Cooper-53138), Airtel, dated 16 May 1973 — cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-116%3A154-155
5/16/73
---
AIRTEL
TO: ACTING DIRECTOR, FBI (164-2111) FROM: SAC, MINNEAPOLIS (164-73) (P)
SUBJECT: NORJAK
OO: SEATTLE
Re Bureau nitel to Seattle dated 4/17/73 and Minneapolis letter to Seattle dated 4/23/73.
Enclosed for Seattle are nine (9) copies of an FD-302 reflecting interview with NEAL R. SUNDBERG and two (2) copies of a 1970 photograph of SUNDBERG.
---
RE SUSPECT [REDACTED]
[REDACTED] advised SA [REDACTED] that the photograph of [REDACTED] does not resemble in any way the unsub.
---
[REDACTED] Minneapolis, Minnesota, advised SA [REDACTED] that the photograph of [REDACTED] is not identical to unsub. (REVIEW 72 [guess: ACLA])
---
RE SUSPECT LEIF E. HANSEN
[REDACTED] supra, advised SA [REDACTED] that the photograph of HANSEN was not identical to unsub.
[REDACTED] supra, advised SA [REDACTED] that the photograph of HANSEN does not resemble unsub.
---
2 - Bureau (Enc. 11) 1 - Seattle (Enc. 11) 2 - Minneapolis RLB:dlk (5)
---
SEARCHED..............INDEXED.............. SERIALIZED..............FILED................... MAY 2 1 1973
---
DB COOPER-53136
---
Su3 467 [REDACTED] Su3 4[guess: 4/5] [REDACTED] Sut 6 40 [guess: PCS] [illegible] [illegible]
MP 164-73
---
HANSON advised that SUNDBERG and his family had lived on the West Coast near San Francisco. He also advised that they had lived in Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
HANSON advised that SUNDBERG has never been athletic due to a problem with his right shoulder.
---
[REDACTED] supra, advised SA BONSHIRE on 4/27/73 that photograph of SUNDBERG in no way resembles unsub. She advised that his base face structure does not resemble unsub and his physical characteristics are not identical. She stated that unsub had an olive complexion and SUNDBERG appears to be fair skinned.
[REDACTED] supra, advised SA BONSHIRE on 4/27/73, that photograph of SUNDBERG is not identical with unsub. She advised that facial characteristics are not similar.
---
UNIDENTIFIED WHITE MALE SUPPLIED BY LEGAT, OTTAWA
---
[REDACTED] supra, advised SA BONSHIRE that photographs of unidentified white male do not resemble unsub. She advised that this individual appears to be more handsome than unsub.
---
[REDACTED] supra, advised SA BONSHIRE on 4/27/73, that photograph of white male in which individual is wearing a cap, does resemble unsub when eyes are covered with a small piece of paper. She advised that during the hijacking, unsub did not look directly at her, nor did he sit up straight in the seat. At all times unsub was bending over. She advised that the angle of the head in photograph was similar to the angle in which she saw unsub. She advised if eyes were [guess: uncovered], this photograph lost some of its similarity to unsub. She advised that from the cheekbone down, this photograph appears to be similar with unsub. She advised that when she first covered the eyes on the photograph, she had a "weird feeling". She advised that she could not positively identify this individual as being identical to unsub, but believed this photograph to be most similar to unsub as she remembered him.
---
Concerning the other three photographs supplied, [REDACTED] advised that they do not resemble in any way the unsub.
---
DB COOPER-53138
---
- 3 -