SAC Las Vegas to SAC Seattle re Don W. Clark, Sub 773

Document date 23 February 1976

Part 119page 291 pageDB Cooper-54508

Open in FBI Vault (Part 119, page 29 of the PDF)
Report a problem

Email this to [email protected]

Id: Cooper-Part-119:029-029

Subject: Cooper Files: Cooper-Part-119:029-029

Document: Memo SAC Las Vegas to SAC Seattle re Don W. Clark, Sub 773
Id: Cooper-Part-119:029-029
Page: https://cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-119%3A029-029

What is wrong (title, date, type, which pages belong together, copies)?


What does the scan show?

Open in email app

A person reads every report. Corrections are made by hand, to the data — titles, dates, names, which pages belong together — never to the scans, and they can take a while to appear.

FBI 164-81, Vault Part 119 p. 29 (DB Cooper-54508), Memo, dated 23 Feb 1976, serial SE 164-81-6863 (as read from the transcript) — cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-119%3A029-029

SAC, SEATTLE (164-81) 2/23/76

SAC, LAS VEGAS (164-60) (P)

NORJAK OO: Seattle

RE: DON W. CLARK SUB 773

Re Sacramento letter to Las Vegas, dated 1/6/76.

A review of records for the Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department, Central Telephone Company and the Greater Las Vegas City Directory, failed to reflect any information concerning a DON or DONALD W. CLARK.

[redacted] Las Vegas, Nevada, advised he has been in residence at that address for the past two and a half years, and the name DONALD W. CLARK is unknown to him.

Contact with the Postal Inspector's Office, Las Vegas, Nevada, also failed to locate any forwarding address for a DONALD W. CLARK.

(2) - Seattle 1 - Las Vegas LPM:cka (3)

---

Sub 773 164-81-6863 [appears crossed out/struck] [illegible signature/initials stamp] FEB 27 1976 [illegible partial stamp, possibly "SEATTLE"]

---

DB COOPER-54508

Serials: LV 164-60, SE 164-81, SE 164-81-6863