SAC New Orleans to Director (Latent Fingerprint Section) re Hoffke fingerprint comparison
Document date 13 August 1976
Report a problem
Email this to [email protected]
Id: Cooper-Part-119:227-227
Subject: Cooper Files: Cooper-Part-119:227-227 Document: Airtel SAC New Orleans to Director (Latent Fingerprint Section) re Hoffke fingerprint comparison Id: Cooper-Part-119:227-227 Page: https://cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-119%3A227-227 What is wrong (title, date, type, which pages belong together, copies)? What does the scan show?
A person reads every report. Corrections are made by hand, to the data — titles, dates, names, which pages belong together — never to the scans, and they can take a while to appear.
FBI 164-81, Vault Part 119 p. 227 (DB Cooper-54765), Airtel, dated 13 Aug 1976, serial 161-71-3054 (as read from the transcript) — cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-119%3A227-227
8/13/76
AIRTEL
TO: DIRECTOR, FBI (164-2111) ATTN: LATENT FINGERPRINT SECTION
FROM: SAC, NEW ORLEANS (164-136)(P)
NORJAK AIRCRAFT HIJACKING
OO: Seattle
Re New Orleans airtel to Seattle, 8/13/76.
On 8/10/76, [redacted] advised he was in prison at Louisiana State Penitentiary, Angola, with an in- dividual known only as "SLICK," whom he is quite sure com- mitted captioned hijacking. He furnished substantial des- criptive and background information concerning "SLICK", and on the basis of this information, VERNUCE ALBERT HOFFKE sug- gested as possibly being identical with individual described by [redacted].
REQUEST OF THE BUREAU
The Latent Fingerprint Section is requested to com- pare latents on file in captioned matter with fingerprints of VERNUCE ALBERT HOFFKE, FBI No. 101 30F.
ARMED AND DANGEROUS.
2 - Bureau 2 - Seattle (164-81) 2 - New Orleans ERP:sdh (6)
---
[handwritten, upper right, appears twice on page: "Dot 788" or similar - illegible]
161-71-3054 [handwritten]
SEARCHED ____ INDEXED ____ SERIALIZED ____ FILED ____ AUG 1 6 1976 FBI SEATTLE
DB COOPER-54765
Serials: 161-71-3054, 164-2111, NO 164-136, SE 164-81
Similar documents
Very similar text — possibly a copy redacted differently, or another memo written from the same template.