SAC Seattle to SAC New Orleans re unreliable source description not matching UNSUB

This copy: Part 119 p. 242Also filed at Part 39 p. 149 (primary) · Part 119 p. 241

This copy’s own title

SAC Seattle to SAC New Orleans re source description of 'Slick' (copy)

Document date 28 January 1977

Part 119page 2421 pageDB Cooper-54780

Another copy of this document is the primary, most legible copy: Part 39 p. 149.

Copies may differ in what was redacted.

Open in FBI Vault (Part 119, page 242 of the PDF)
Report a problem

Email this to [email protected]

Id: Cooper-Part-119:242-242

Subject: Cooper Files: Cooper-Part-119:242-242

Document: Memo SAC Seattle to SAC New Orleans re source description of 'Slick' (copy)
Id: Cooper-Part-119:242-242
Page: https://cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-119%3A242-242

What is wrong (title, date, type, which pages belong together, copies)?


What does the scan show?

Open in email app

A person reads every report. Corrections are made by hand, to the data — titles, dates, names, which pages belong together — never to the scans, and they can take a while to appear.

FBI 164-81, Vault Part 119 p. 242 (DB Cooper-54780), Memo, dated 28 Jan 1977, serial SE 164-81-7386 (as read from the transcript) — cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-119%3A242-242

OPTIONAL FORM NO. 10 JULY 1973 EDITION GSA FPMR (41 CFR) 101-11.6 UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT Memorandum

TO : SAC, NEW ORLEANS (164-136) DATE: 1/28/77

FROM : SAC, SEATTLE (164-81)

SUBJECT: NORJAK OO: SEATTLE BUfile 164-2111

RE: UNSUB; aka Slick SOURCE [redacted] SUB 788

---

The information furnished by [redacted] to date does not appear to be compatible with what is known by Seattle concerning NORJAK. The description [redacted] furnishes regarding "Slick" is in no way even close to the description of UNSUB in this matter. In addition, it appears that [redacted] reliability may be questionable.

However, Seattle cannot make a final decision as to whether [redacted] should or should not review photo- graphs referred to in New Orleans letter to Seattle dated 1/10/77.

New Orleans is requested to advise Seattle whether it is felt any logical lead has not been covered concerning this aspect of the investigation and, in addition, advise whether or not New Orleans feels it is feasible to have [redacted] examine approximately 10,000 photographs maintained by the Louisiana State Police.

ARMED AND DANGEROUS

---

2 - New Orleans (164-136) 3 - Seattle (164-81) RNN:arm (5)

---

Sub 788 164-81-7386 [guess: partially illegible number]

---

DB COOPER-54780

---

Buy U.S. Savings Bonds Regularly on the Payroll Savings Plan

Serials: 164-2111, NO 164-136, SE 164-81, SE 164-81-7386