SAC Portland to Director (Identification Division) re NORJAK suspect fingerprint check
Document date 4 August 1976
Report a problem
Email this to [email protected]
Id: Cooper-Part-120:185-185
Subject: Cooper Files: Cooper-Part-120:185-185 Document: Airtel SAC Portland to Director (Identification Division) re NORJAK suspect fingerprint check Id: Cooper-Part-120:185-185 Page: https://cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-120%3A185-185 What is wrong (title, date, type, which pages belong together, copies)? What does the scan show?
A person reads every report. Corrections are made by hand, to the data — titles, dates, names, which pages belong together — never to the scans, and they can take a while to appear.
FBI 164-81, Vault Part 120 p. 185 (DB Cooper-55199), Airtel, dated 4 Aug 1976 — cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-120%3A185-185
FD-36 (Rev. 2-14-74)
FBI Date: 8/4/76
Transmit the following in _______________ (Type in plaintext or code)
Via AIRTEL AIRMAIL (Precedence)
TO: DIRECTOR, FBI (164-2111) ATTN: IDENTIFICATION DIVISION
FROM: SAC, PORTLAND (164-41) (P)
SUBJECT: NORJAK
RE: [redacted]
For information Bureau and Seattle, captioned individual has been suggested by LUCILLE WARREN, reporter for "The Oregonian," Portland daily newspaper, as a possible suspect in this matter. Investigation by Portland appears to eliminate [redacted] However, in view of press interest as source of lead, the following lead is set forth:
REQUEST OF THE BUREAU
THE IDENTIFICATION DIVISION
Compare fingerprints of [redacted] WMA, DOB [redacted] 6'0", 205 pounds, brown hair and eyes, USNRSN [redacted] residence [redacted] Bend, Oregon, with the unidentified latents in this matter.
ARMED AND DANGEROUS.
3 - Bureau 2 - Seattle (164-81) 2 - Portland
RPH:llw (7)
[handwritten case number, partially illegible: 164-81-7043 [guess: 7043]]
Approved: _______________ Sent _______________ Special Agent in Charge
---
SEARCHED ____ INDEXED ____ SERIALIZED ____ FILED ____ AUG 10 1976 FBI SEATTLE
---
DB COOPER-55199
Serials: 164-2111, PD 164-41, SE 164-81
Similar documents
Very similar text — possibly a copy redacted differently, or another memo written from the same template.