SAC Portland to SAC Seattle re Oregon source's report of man claiming to be Cooper
Document date 17 December 1976
Report a problem
Email this to [email protected]
Id: Cooper-Part-122:075-075
Subject: Cooper Files: Cooper-Part-122:075-075 Document: Airtel SAC Portland to SAC Seattle re Oregon source's report of man claiming to be Cooper Id: Cooper-Part-122:075-075 Page: https://cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-122%3A075-075 What is wrong (title, date, type, which pages belong together, copies)? What does the scan show?
A person reads every report. Corrections are made by hand, to the data — titles, dates, names, which pages belong together — never to the scans, and they can take a while to appear.
FBI 164-81, Vault Part 122 p. 75 (DB Cooper-56165), Airtel, dated 17 Dec 1976 — cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-122%3A075-075
FD-36 (Rev. 2-14-74)
FBI
Date: 12/17/76
Transmit the following in _________ (Type in plaintext or code) Via AIRTEL AIRMAIL (Precedence)
TO: SAC, SEATTLE (164-81)
FROM: SAC, PORTLAND (164-41)(P)
SUBJECT: NORJAK (00: Seattle)
On 12/15/76, [redacted], Oregon, telephone [redacted] advised the following:
He has [redacted] is very friendly with a man who formerly [redacted] Washington. [redacted]
According to [redacted] told him that [redacted] had advised him that recently [redacted] in fact, D. B. COOPER.
According to [redacted] [redacted] and did not hijack the airliner for the money. He did it only as a challenge.
[redacted] stated he was unwilling to pursue the matter any further [redacted] in an effort to obtain more specific information concerning the identity of this individual. In addition, [redacted] was unwilling to identify [redacted] or indicate where he was employed.
In view of the above, Portland will conduct no further investigation unless advised to do so by the off[ice] [redacted]
2 - Seattle 2 - Portland
RHT:laa (4)
Approved: [signature] Special Agent in Charge Sent _________ M Per _________
GPO: 1975 O - 590-992 DB COOPER-56165