SAC Seattle to SAC New Orleans directing attempt to locate subject
Document date 31 January 1977
Report a problem
Email this to [email protected]
Id: Cooper-Part-122:090-090
Subject: Cooper Files: Cooper-Part-122:090-090 Document: Memo SAC Seattle to SAC New Orleans directing attempt to locate subject Id: Cooper-Part-122:090-090 Page: https://cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-122%3A090-090 What is wrong (title, date, type, which pages belong together, copies)? What does the scan show?
A person reads every report. Corrections are made by hand, to the data — titles, dates, names, which pages belong together — never to the scans, and they can take a while to appear.
FBI 164-81, Vault Part 122 p. 90 (DB Cooper-56187), Memo, dated 31 Jan 1977, serial SE 164-81-7342 (as read from the transcript) — cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-122%3A090-090
JULY 1973 EDITION GSA FPMR (41 CFR) 101-11.6 UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT Memorandum
TO : SAC, NEW ORLEANS (164-136) DATE: 1/31/77
FROM : SAC, SEATTLE (164-81) (P)
SUBJECT: NORJAK OO: SEATTLE BUfile 164-2111
RE: UNSUB; [redacted] SUB 879
Re Minneapolis letter to Seattle, dated 12/28/76, and Seattle report of SA [redacted] dated 5/30/73.
LEADS:
NEW ORLEANS DIVISION
At Louisiana State Penitentiary
Will attempt to interview [redacted] con- cerning his knowledge of captioned matter. (Note prior to interview, Seattle report of SA [redacted] dated 5/30/73 should be reviewed).
ARMED AND DANGEROUS.
2 - New Orleans (164-136) 2 - Seattle (164-81 Sub 879) RNN:ecf (4)
[handwritten, partially illegible initials/marks near distribution list]
[handwritten, in margin near lower right]: Sub 879 164-81-7342
Searched..... Serialized.... Indexed.... Filed....
Buy U.S. Savings Bonds Regularly on the Payroll Savings Plan
DB COOPER-56187
---
Searched..... Serialized.... Indexed.... Filed....
DB COOPER-56187
---
Sub 879 164-81-7342 [illegible cursive marks/initials near distribution block]
Serials: 164-2111, NO 164-136, SE 164-81, SE 164-81-7342
Similar documents
Very similar text — possibly a copy redacted differently, or another memo written from the same template.