To SAC Seattle re telephone contact and photo spread shown to witness, 164-81-668
Document date 6 December 1971
Also filed separately as sections:
- To SAC Seattle re witness unable to identify suspect from photo lineup
- To SAC Seattle re photo display to witness (NORJAK)
- To SAC Seattle re photo display, Sub-file H
- SA to SAC Seattle re NORJAK suspect photo display (serial 671)
- SA to SAC Seattle re photographs shown to witness 12/6/71 (serial 672)
- SA to SAC Seattle re UNSUB photo display, Sub. H (serial 673)
- SA to SAC Seattle re photographs shown to witness 12/6/71 (serial 674)
- SA to SAC Seattle re photo spread shown to witness 12/7/71 (file copy)
- To SAC Seattle re witness shown photo spread, suspect eliminated
- SA to SAC Seattle re photo display to witness on 12/17/71
- SA to SAC Seattle re telephonic photo display to witness, NORJAK
- SA to SAC Seattle re telephonic photo display, NORJAK
- SA to SAC Seattle re telephonic photo display 12/6/71, NORJAK
- SA to SAC Seattle re telephonic photo display 12/6/71, NORJAK
- SA to SAC Seattle re telephonic photo display 12/6/71, NORJAK
- SA to SAC Seattle re telephonic photo display 12/6/71, NORJAK
- SA to SAC Seattle re witness eliminating suspect from photographs
- SA to SAC Seattle re suspect eliminated from photo display
- SA to SAC Seattle re telephonic photo display, UNSUB NWA 305
- SA to SAC Seattle re Seattle witness shown photographs of NORJAK suspect
- To SAC Seattle re telephonic photo showing eliminating suspect
- SA to SAC Seattle re photo display eliminating suspect
- SA Giese to SAC Seattle re photos including Daniel Louis Cooper shown by telephone contact
Report a problem
Email this to [email protected]
Id: Cooper-Part-13:330-331
Subject: Cooper Files: Cooper-Part-13:330-331 Document: Memo to SAC Seattle re telephone contact and photo spread shown to witness, 164-81-668 Id: Cooper-Part-13:330-331 Page: https://cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-13%3A330-331 What is wrong (title, date, type, which pages belong together, copies)? What does the scan show?
A person reads every report. Corrections are made by hand, to the data — titles, dates, names, which pages belong together — never to the scans, and they can take a while to appear.
FBI 164-81, Vault Part 13 pp. 330–331 (DB Cooper-3193–3194), Memo, dated 6 Dec 1971, serial SE 164-81-668 (as read from the transcript) — cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-13%3A330-331
OPTIONAL FORM NO. 10 MAY 1962 EDITION GSA FPMR (41 CFR) 101-11.6 UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT Memorandum
TO : SAC, SEATTLE (164-81) DATE: 12/6/71
FROM : [REDACTED b6/b7C] [REDACTED b6/b7C]
SUBJECT: UNSUB; NORTHWEST AIRLINES FLIGHT 305, 11/24/71 CAA-HIJACKING; EXTORTION
---
On 12/6/71 SA [REDACTED] contacted [REDACTED] telephone [REDACTED] telephone [REDACTED]
SA [REDACTED] exhibited to [REDACTED] a group of photographs, including that of [REDACTED], a suspect in the instant matter.
[REDACTED] eliminated this suspect, based upon his recollection of the hijacker in this case.
---
Sub- H.
---
164-81 cc 1-164-81 [REDACTED] CNG (3)
---
164-81-668 SEARCHED _____ INDEXED SERIALIZED _____ FILED DEC 6 1971 FBI — SEATTLE Manning [initials]
---
DB Cooper-3193
---
Buy U.S. Savings Bonds Regularly on the Payroll Savings Plan
OPTIONAL FORM NO. 10 MAY 1962 EDITION GSA FPMR (41 CFR) 101-11.6 UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT Memorandum
TO : SAC, SEATTLE (164-81) DATE: 12/6/71
FROM : SA [REDACTED]
SUBJECT: UNSUB; NORTHWEST AIRLINES FLIGHT 305, 11/24/71 CAA-HIJACKING; EXTORTION
---
On 12/6/71 SA [REDACTED] contacted [REDACTED] Telephone telephone [REDACTED]
SA [REDACTED] exhibited to [REDACTED] a group of photographs, including that of [REDACTED], a suspect in the instant matter.
[REDACTED] eliminated this suspect, based upon his recollection of the hijacker in this case.
---
2-164-81 CC 1-164-81 [REDACTED] CNG (3)
---
164-81- 668 SEARCHED ___INDEXED___ SERIALIZED___ FILED___ DEC 6 1971 FBI — SEATTLE
---
Buy U.S. Savings Bonds Regularly on the Payroll Savings Plan DB Cooper-3194
Serials: SE 164-81, SE 164-81-668
Similar documents
Very similar text — possibly a copy redacted differently, or another memo written from the same template.