SA to SAC Seattle re suspect resembling composite (duplicate copy)

Document date 6 December 1971

Part 13pages 372–3743 pagesDB Cooper-3235–3237

Also filed at: Part 99 pp. 162–164

Copies may differ in what was redacted.

Open in FBI Vault (Part 13, page 372 of the PDF)
Report a problem

Email this to [email protected]

Id: Cooper-Part-13:372-374

Subject: Cooper Files: Cooper-Part-13:372-374

Document: Memo SA to SAC Seattle re suspect resembling composite (duplicate copy)
Id: Cooper-Part-13:372-374
Page: https://cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-13%3A372-374

What is wrong (title, date, type, which pages belong together, copies)?


What does the scan show?

Open in email app

A person reads every report. Corrections are made by hand, to the data — titles, dates, names, which pages belong together — never to the scans, and they can take a while to appear.

FBI 164-81, Vault Part 13 pp. 372–374 (DB Cooper-3235–3237), Memo, dated 6 Dec 1971, serial SE 164-81-694 (as read from the transcript) — cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-13%3A372-374

SAC, SEATTLE (164-81) 12/6/71

SA [REDACTED]

UNSUB, aka Dan Cooper NORTHWEST AIRLINES FLIGHT #305 PORTLAND TO SEATTLE 11/24/71 CAA - HIJACKING; EXTORTION (OO:SE)

---

RE: [REDACTED]

Investigation initiated upon receipt of information from [REDACTED] stating that he showed a striking resemblance to artist's conception of Unsub and that he was also [REDACTED] area.

Records of the Seattle Police Department and King County Sheriff's Office checked on November 30, 1971, failed to produce a record identifiable with [REDACTED]

Seattle Credit Bureau records checked on December 1, 1971, indicated that in September of 1968, [REDACTED] was [REDACTED]

On December 1, 1971, [REDACTED] [REDACTED] was interviewed and advised that [REDACTED]

---

3-Seattle 164-81-694

MRM/rah [initials] (3) DB Cooper-3235

SE 164-81

---

[redacted] requested that SA [redacted] not contact [redacted] concerning the subject [redacted]

[redacted] proceeded to take SA [redacted] into the office of [redacted]

[redacted] explained that [redacted]

[redacted]

[redacted]

---

On December 1, 1971, [redacted] was interviewed at [redacted] at which time he stated that he had not been involved in captioned matter. He con- firmed that he had worked the day of November 24th and had spent that evening at [redacted] [redacted] resides, located at [redacted] [redacted] general appearance was definitely not that of the artist's conception of Unsub and [redacted] emphatically stated that [redacted] he would think that anyone making such a jump that Unsub did would have to be crazy.

---

2

DB Cooper-3236

SE 164-81

---

In view of the above it is recommended no further investigation be conducted concerning this suspect.

---

3 DB Cooper-3237

Serials: SE 164-81, SE 164-81-694