Nitel Miami to Minneapolis and Seattle re Cooper investigation
Document date 7 December 1971
Also filed at: Part 14 p. 169
Copies may differ in what was redacted.
Report a problem
Email this to [email protected]
Id: Cooper-Part-14:168-168
Subject: Cooper Files: Cooper-Part-14:168-168 Document: Nitel Miami to Minneapolis and Seattle re Cooper investigation Id: Cooper-Part-14:168-168 Page: https://cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-14%3A168-168 What is wrong (title, date, type, which pages belong together, copies)? What does the scan show?
A person reads every report. Corrections are made by hand, to the data — titles, dates, names, which pages belong together — never to the scans, and they can take a while to appear.
FBI 164-81, Vault Part 14 p. 168 (DB Cooper-3532), Teletype, dated 7 Dec 1971, serial SE 164-81-787 (as read from the transcript) — cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-14%3A168-168
NR010 MM PLAIN 622PM NITEL 12-7-71 JMS TO MINNEAPOLIS 164-73 SEATTLE 164-81 FROM MIAMI 164-552 IP
---
UNSUB, AKA DAN COOPER, NORTHWEST AIRLINES FLIGHT THREE ZERO FIVE, PORTLAND TO SEATTLE, NOVEMBER TWENTYFOUR, SEVENTYONE. CAA - HIJACKING; EXTORTION. OO: SEATTLE.
---
RE SEATTLE TELETYPE TO MINNEAPOLIS AND MIAMI, DEC. SIX LAST AND MIAMI TELCALL TO MINNEAPOLIS DEC. SEVEN LAST. FOR INFO RECIPIENT OFFICES, [REDACTED] TO MIAMI OFFICE AS PROLIFIC WRITER OF POSTCARDS AND LETTERS TO HIGH GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS AND ANYONE WHOSE NAME APPEARS PROMINENTLY IN THE NEWS. HER MESSAGE IS USUALLY SOMETHING TO THE EFFECT OF "WHAT DO YOU KNOW ABOUT MY MISREPRESENTATION?" IN VIEW OF [REDACTED] ACTIVITIES MINNEAPOLIS SHOULD DISCONTINUE LEAD TO INTERVIEW [REDACTED]
---
END VAB FBI SEATTLE CLR
---
[handwritten] [guess: Pler] [guess: approved] [guess: MP wire] [guess: RNO] 164-81-787 SEARCHED _____ INDEXED ____ SERIALIZED ___ FILED ___ DEC 7 1971 FBI - SEATTLE ANDERSON [guess: DTK] 12/9/71 Notified NW Airlines, Seattle
---
DB Cooper-3532
Serials: MM 164-552, MP 164-73, SE 164-81, SE 164-81-787
Similar documents
Very similar text — possibly a copy redacted differently, or another memo written from the same template.