SA Farrell to SAC Seattle re hospital insurance claim for man injured 11/24/71
Document date 9 December 1971
Also filed at: Part 103 p. 24
Copies may differ in what was redacted.
Report a problem
Email this to [email protected]
Id: Cooper-Part-15:071-072
Subject: Cooper Files: Cooper-Part-15:071-072 Document: Memo SA Farrell to SAC Seattle re hospital insurance claim for man injured 11/24/71 Id: Cooper-Part-15:071-072 Page: https://cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-15%3A071-072 What is wrong (title, date, type, which pages belong together, copies)? What does the scan show?
A person reads every report. Corrections are made by hand, to the data — titles, dates, names, which pages belong together — never to the scans, and they can take a while to appear.
FBI 164-81, Vault Part 15 pp. 71–72 (DB Cooper-3873–3874), Memo, dated 9 Dec 1971, serial SE 164-81-944 (as read from the transcript) — cooper.theunsolved.net/documents/Cooper-Part-15%3A071-072
OPTIONAL FORM NO. 10 MAY 1962 EDITION GSA FPMR (41 CFR) 101-11.6 UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT Memorandum
TO : SAC, SEATTLE (164-81) DATE: 12/9/71
FROM : SA CHARLES E. FARRELL [REDACTED b6/b7C]
SUBJECT: NORJAK
RE: [REDACTED b6/b7C]
---
On 12/3/71, [REDACTED] Hospital, advised that the hospital had been contacted recently by SA WEBBER in connection with the hijacking case and since talking to him, she came across a claim for insurance [REDACTED] home address shown as [REDACTED] telephone [REDACTED]
[REDACTED] fit the general description of the hijacker.
The data in connection with the insurance claim indicated that he was injured at 11:00 PM, 11/24/71, at [REDACTED] advised on 11/25/71, the hospital called [REDACTED] at telephone [REDACTED] and a woman employee said she guessed he was working.
[REDACTED] stated that [REDACTED] was discharged from [REDACTED] and at that time, they advised that "yes" he had been working and inferred that their insurance would handle the hospital bill.
---
LEAD
SEATTLE at [REDACTED] Washington
Resolve whether or not [REDACTED] should be considered a suspect, possibly through verifying with [REDACTED] [REDACTED] the fact that he was on duty with them on 11/24/71. This could be handled by telephone rather than having Portland do it.
---
CEF:klb (3)
[signature]
SEARCHED _____ INDEXED _____ SERIALIZED /[REDACTED] FILED [REDACTED] DEC [REDACTED] FBI — SEATTLE
16 4-81- 944
Buy U.S. Savings Bonds Regularly on the Payroll Savings Plan DB Cooper-3873
SAC, SEATTLE (164-81) 12/9/71
SA CHARLES E. FARRELL
NORJAK
RE: [redacted] [redacted]
---
On 12/3/71, [redacted] Hospital, advised that the hospital had been contacted recently by SA WEBBER in connection with the hijacking case and since talking to him, she came across a claim for insurance [redacted] home address shown as [redacted] telephone
[redacted] fit the general description of the hijacker.
The data in connection with the insurance claim indicated that he was injured at 11:00 PM, 11/24/71, at
[redacted] advised on 11/25/71, the hospital called [redacted] at telephone [redacted] and a woman employee said she guessed he was working.
[redacted] stated that [redacted] was discharged from [redacted] and at that time, they advised that "yes" he had been working and inferred that their insurance would handle the hospital bill.
---
LEAD
SEATTLE at [redacted] Washington
Resolve whether or not [redacted] should be considered a suspect, possibly through verifying with [redacted] [redacted] the fact that he was on duty with them on 11/24/71. This could be handled by telephone rather than having Portland do it.
---
CEP:klb (3)
64-81- 944 SEARCHED___INDEXED___ SERIALIZED___FILED___ FBI—SEATTLE DB Cooper-3874
---
b6 b7C
Serials: SE 164-81, SE 164-81-944